I don't think the Daily Mail has moved on at all. It's still owned by the same family. I still think it's fundamentally fascist and racist and the only reason it doesn't still support the Nazis is only because it went to war against Britain's wishes. Ideologically, they'd still support it.BrianW said:The Daily Mail was the paper that in the 1930s had a headline : 'Hurrah for the Blackshirts.' Mind you, I must be fair and record that many people favoured the Nazis in those days, right up to certain members of the nobility and royal family, all of which has been conveniently shovelled under the carpet.
OK, we've moved on since then, but it's still a vile paper.
To Jules - sorry for misusing your name. That was unfair, out of order, and a low blow comrade.
Skashion said:Who the fuck's that?gordondaviesmoustache said:Arnold Schwatzenegger's powers base is the Catholic Church?
Skashion said:I don't think the Daily Mail has moved on at all. It's still owned by the same family. I still think it's fundamentally fascist and racist and the only reason it doesn't still support the Nazis is only because it went to war against Britain's wishes. Ideologically, they'd still support it.BrianW said:The Daily Mail was the paper that in the 1930s had a headline : 'Hurrah for the Blackshirts.' Mind you, I must be fair and record that many people favoured the Nazis in those days, right up to certain members of the nobility and royal family, all of which has been conveniently shovelled under the carpet.
OK, we've moved on since then, but it's still a vile paper.
To Jules - sorry for misusing your name. That was unfair, out of order, and a low blow comrade.