dannybcity
Well-Known Member
The thing with this video is why would NASA go to be bother of realising a photo then photoshopping stuff out of it. They just wouldn't realise it in the first place.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The dying NASA scientist videos
- Thread starter mammutly
- Start date
The Fat el Hombre
Well-Known Member
Haha fake as fuk
That said, I think anyone who doesn't believe that there aren't other lifeforms knocking about is very narrow minded to the point of being thick as fuck. There's no chance of there being anything like that is shown in that vid on mars though
That said, I think anyone who doesn't believe that there aren't other lifeforms knocking about is very narrow minded to the point of being thick as fuck. There's no chance of there being anything like that is shown in that vid on mars though
I don't believe for a second that we've been visited by aliens. I do believe they're out there somewhere, in space. It'd be folly to believe otherwise once you've realised just how vast space actually is.
They could come one day. But I doubt it'll be able to be kept secret if they did come. I hope they come in peace though. Earth is an easy target because of innocent radiation of energy into space. We're the baby bird cheeping in the unprotected tree branch of the solar system.
They could come one day. But I doubt it'll be able to be kept secret if they did come. I hope they come in peace though. Earth is an easy target because of innocent radiation of energy into space. We're the baby bird cheeping in the unprotected tree branch of the solar system.
Citizen Green
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 7,280
Ahh the old Greys
johnmc
Well-Known Member
Well Fat El Hombre - to say someone is thick for choosing to believe that there are only one set of circumstances where life would exist is as narrow minded as saying the opposite.
If we were 1% closer to the sun we would burn, 1% further away we would fereeze. Is it not beyond the realms of belief that there is only one set of these perfect conditions in the Universe? Otherwise you are saying the universe is repeated elsewhere which if it isnt in the area we have seen what makes people so sure it will be further a field.
Some things exist only in certain places on earth - why cant earth only occur in one place in the universe?
If we were 1% closer to the sun we would burn, 1% further away we would fereeze. Is it not beyond the realms of belief that there is only one set of these perfect conditions in the Universe? Otherwise you are saying the universe is repeated elsewhere which if it isnt in the area we have seen what makes people so sure it will be further a field.
Some things exist only in certain places on earth - why cant earth only occur in one place in the universe?
johnmc said:Well Fat El Hombre - to say someone is thick for choosing to believe that there are only one set of circumstances where life would exist is as narrow minded as saying the opposite.
If we were 1% closer to the sun we would burn, 1% further away we would fereeze. Is it not beyond the realms of belief that there is only one set of these perfect conditions in the Universe? Otherwise you are saying the universe is repeated elsewhere which if it isnt in the area we have seen what makes people so sure it will be further a field.
Some things exist only in certain places on earth - why cant earth only occur in one place in the universe?
For humans , the conditions you describe are perfect and if it were 1% more either way , humans wouldnt exist . But this doesnt mean that there arent other types of beings who adapt and thrive in different conditions
johnmc
Well-Known Member
Ragnarok said:For humans , the conditions you describe are perfect and if it were 1% more either way , humans wouldnt exist . But this doesnt mean that there arent other types of beings who adapt and thrive in different conditions
Not just humans, all life forms (that we know about)
All i am saying that if you can call someone narrow minded for not believing in something for which there is no proof, well you can call them narrow minded for not believing that this world we are in is due to a one off perfect set of circumstances
johnmc said:Well Fat El Hombre - to say someone is thick for choosing to believe that there are only one set of circumstances where life would exist is as narrow minded as saying the opposite.
If we were 1% closer to the sun we would burn, 1% further away we would fereeze. Is it not beyond the realms of belief that there is only one set of these perfect conditions in the Universe? Otherwise you are saying the universe is repeated elsewhere which if it isnt in the area we have seen what makes people so sure it will be further a field.
Some things exist only in certain places on earth - why cant earth only occur in one place in the universe?
Your percentages are slight off there. It'd take a 5%-10% shift either way to cause enough of an effect.
When you think there are more stars in the universe than there are grains of sand on all the beaches in all the world. To think that only 1 of those stars harbours a planet that can sustain life seems pretty far fetched to me.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
peacefrog said:johnmc said:Well Fat El Hombre - to say someone is thick for choosing to believe that there are only one set of circumstances where life would exist is as narrow minded as saying the opposite.
If we were 1% closer to the sun we would burn, 1% further away we would fereeze. Is it not beyond the realms of belief that there is only one set of these perfect conditions in the Universe? Otherwise you are saying the universe is repeated elsewhere which if it isnt in the area we have seen what makes people so sure it will be further a field.
Some things exist only in certain places on earth - why cant earth only occur in one place in the universe?
Your percentages are slight off there. It'd take a 5%-10% shift either way to cause enough of an effect.
When you think there are more stars in the universe than there are grains of sand on all the beaches in all the world. To think that only 1 of those stars harbours a planet that can sustain life seems pretty far fetched to me.
It can seem far fetched yes. But also, it could be true. You cannot say that there IS life form out there as you have no proof - is it not narrow minded to say there definately is and there is no chance that we are one offs?
If you think there are humans roaming about somewhere else wearing Nike Air max and going to football matches I say thats far fetched
I can't say life does exist, no, but I do think it very likely.johnmc said:peacefrog said:Your percentages are slight off there. It'd take a 5%-10% shift either way to cause enough of an effect.
When you think there are more stars in the universe than there are grains of sand on all the beaches in all the world. To think that only 1 of those stars harbours a planet that can sustain life seems pretty far fetched to me.
It can seem far fetched yes. But also, it could be true. You cannot say that there IS life form out there as you have no proof - is it not narrow minded to say there definately is and there is no chance that we are one offs?
If you think there are humans roaming about somewhere else wearing Nike Air max and going to football matches I say thats far fetched
I don't believe in a parallel universe either.