I think the title of the thread is accurate, their "IS" an agenda against our club. However your attitude is a very healthy one and should be embraced by all blues,, fuck the media!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The end of the agenda debate?
- Thread starter Blue Mooner
- Start date
I think the title of the thread is accurate, their "IS" an agenda against our club. However your attitude is a very healthy one and should be embraced by all blues,, fuck the media!
They have had it all season.
Which is why it’s quite a surprise the pitch side camera didn’t work at Schalke.
No it's not.
crazyg
Well-Known Member
Pure, ahem, "coincidence".They have had it all season.
Which is why it’s quite a surprise the pitch side camera didn’t work at Schalke.
More bad luck for us that it wasn't working, compounded by inadvertently ignoring their own rules by not going with the original decision of corner.No it's not.
Honestly, some people are making a molehill out of a montain.
Oh, hang on............................
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
More likely it's just an ex-ref from the PL who was on hand, and not anyone active at PGMOL.
They actually said PGMOL and then explained to the viewers who they are.
Pingu the Penguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 7,918
It's clearly all part of the massive anti-CIty Agenda... though I'm a bit foggy on the rationale. Stay tuned - OP and others will lucidly explain how this fits into the conspiracy narrative.
Nice try. But refs never do press on their errors. Except this time.
Why?
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
They actually said PGMOL and then explained to the viewers who they are.
Fair enough.
Sounds pretty odd, and unusually open for them.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Our fans will be collapsing singing all that with the speed we build up there'll be no time to breathe.To the tune of glad all over/ we’ve got Guardiola
They say that we’re cheating, say that we’re cheating
All of the time, all of the time
Can’t spend our own money, spend our own money
But to have debt is fine, have debt is fine
Coz we face allegations, we face allegations, we face allegations
All the tiiiiiiiiimmmmmeeeeee
The cartel don’t like us, the cartel don’t like us
We broke the top four, we broke the top four
UEFA and FIFA, Uefa and FIFA
Corrupt to the core, corrupt to the core
Coz we face allegations, we face allegations, we face allegations
All the tiiiiiiiiiimmmmmeeeeeee
Where was the fair play, where was the fair play
When we were shit, when we were shit
We now boo their anthem, we now boo their anthem
And they don’t like , they don’t like it
Coz we face allegations, we face allegations, we face allegations
All the tiiiiiiiiimmmmmmmmeeeeeee
Their trying to break us, trying to break us
A new leak everyday, a new leak everyday
But we are Man City, we are Man City
And we’re here to stay, we’re here to stay
Coz we face allegations, we face allegations, we face allegations
All the tiiiiimmmmmmeeeeee
its a Barm
Well-Known Member
On sky, did city get lucky ha ha yes lucky to have 70% possession lucky to have the best team in the league lucky to score most goals could go on all night, and of agenda no chance.
In work today Liverpool fan talking about the pro bias city enjoy, favourable decisions, refs on our books, bribes from the top...he was foaming at the mouth. He was deadly serious. Just goes to show how focusing on things that go in/against favour can make you think in a certain way.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Totally different incidents. Sterling was already offside by moving towards and attempting to play the ball before the defender kicks it.
You’re not surely saying that Sterling’s goal was rightly awarded are you?
Where in the offside rules I posted on here, does it say that ?
It does say that a player moving toward the ball in an offside position, if fouled, can have a penalty.
- A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball (except from a deliberate save by any opponent) is not considered to have gained an advantage.
- a player in an offisde position is moving towards the ball with the intention of playing the ball and is fouled before playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the foul is penalised as it has occurred before the offside offence.
It is all about what constitutes a challenge, or whether an opponent is impeded.
What Sterling did, would not be rated as 'a challenge' to any of us, if he was defending at the other end. We would all be telling him to get in & make one & blaming him for not making one, if it ended up in a goal against.
The ref, has obviously decided the same, he didn't make a challenge, so therefore he has correctly ruled.
We all know it's offside, but the rules allow it not to be, so it isn't, because the ref decided to interpret the rules in that way, which he is entitled to. Just as the two refs who gave those ridiculous pens are also allowed to.
That's ridiculous.