Fair enough.Fully deserved IMO for such a stupid comparison
I was only pointing out that the dippers blame any of their stupid actions as "passion".
Fair enough.Fully deserved IMO for such a stupid comparison
I mean, why even drag bricking coaches and pushing innocent people into fountains into the discussion in the first place?Fair enough.
I was only pointing out that the dippers blame any of their stupid actions as "passion".
Because he hasn't got an answer to the fact that certain City fans will condemn a dipper for pushing someone into a fountain but then refuse to condemn, and will even applaud as commendable passion, someone for running onto the field of play during a match,(an illegal act) jumping on and potentially injuring one of our players because they happen to be a City fan.Why the insult?
Deary me you must be a barrel of laughs at the game! What a shit comparisonBecause he hasn't got an answer to the fact that certain City fans will condemn a dipper for pushing someone into a fountain but then refuse to condemn, and will even applaud as commendable passion, someone for running onto the field of play during a match,(an illegal act) jumping on and potentially injuring one of our players because they happen to be a City fan.
Now, while some would call that sticking up for one of our own, others would prefer to call it what it actually is, hypocrisy.
Not seen him for a while, where does he work now ?
Because he hasn't got an answer to the fact that certain City fans will condemn a dipper for pushing someone into a fountain but then refuse to condemn, and will even applaud as commendable passion, someone for running onto the field of play during a match,(an illegal act) jumping on and potentially injuring one of our players because they happen to be a City fan.
Now, while some would call that sticking up for one of our own, others would prefer to call it what it actually is, hypocrisy.
That is not true… at all. A fact can be the description of generally held opinion. In this case, the generally held opinion of Liverpool fan behaviour on the forum.
And passion is passion. It is not vague; I am using the word used by many in this thread to not only excuse the fan’s behaviour but to argue that they should face no consequences for their behaviour. I don’t have to give examples of other acts of passion, as we are talking about a specific one others have described as an “act of passion”.
Again, it seems you are using (perhaps unintentionally, based on misunderstanding) a logical fallacy common to debate: broaden and obscure the subject of the discussion to make your position stronger. That is not valid, no matter how many different ways you try to achieve it.
We are talking about a specific incident and I am talking about specific responses (defences) of that incident, and why they are faulty, both logically and from the perspective of most blues on this forum (of which I have been a member far, far longer than you, so may have a better understanding of the prevailing opinions on it).
I don’t think there is any point to you and I continuing to debate this, though, as we are either having two completely different good faith discussions, or you are having one bad faith debate with me (attributing an argument to me I am not making in any way).
So I will just assume the former is true, and say I am not interested in that separate discussion right now (which may have some validity if it is about the broad perception of other fans and their motives for behaviour).
Rum lad is Brian, good company for a night out.cash in hand work last time I knew on sites etc.
If you can’t see the difference between a scouse bully pushing an innocent local into a fountain and a happy City fan celebrating a goal with our players then there’s no hope for you, just going round in circles now.Because he hasn't got an answer to the fact that certain City fans will condemn a dipper for pushing someone into a fountain but then refuse to condemn, and will even applaud as commendable passion, someone for running onto the field of play during a match,(an illegal act) jumping on and potentially injuring one of our players because they happen to be a City fan.
Now, while some would call that sticking up for one of our own, others would prefer to call it what it actually is, hypocrisy.
Rum lad is Brian, good company for a night out.