The General Election Thread

[whp.blue]

The good Prof isn't a 'celebrity', he's one of the greatest minds we've ever seen and its offencive to say anything different!

and Multi millionaire so he has a lot in common with Red Ed so he is going with the party that acts in his best interests.

PS Has anyone checked if his voice synthesizer has been hacked by rascal?

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the inevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

 

[Bluemanc100]

Steve Coogan is the only 'celebrity' I'm disappointed with, all the other labour supporters are vermin.

I've just seen his party political broadcast for the first time... I think he was brought up near De La Salle in Middleton wasn't he?

I guess if Labour don't get in and things don't suit him then he can simply fuck off to LA....

 

[DelToro]

and Multi millionaire so he has a lot in common with Red Ed so he is going with the party that acts in his best interests.

PS Has anyone checked if his voice synthesizer has been hacked by rascal?

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

Typing in bold has made your argument much more persuasive.

 

[whp.blue]

Steve Coogan is the only 'celebrity' I'm disappointed with, all the other labour supporters are vermin.

I've just seen his party political broadcast for the first time... I think he was brought up near De La Salle in Middleton wasn't he?

I guess if Labour don't get in and things don't suit him hen he can simply fuck off to LA....

The Luxury of being a Champaign Socialist

They don't have to live with the consequences.

 

[SWP's back]

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

Typing in bold has made your argument much more persuasive.

I always wondered why people did that

 

[whp.blue]

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the inevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

Typing in bold has made your argument much more persuasive.

Thank you that was my intention and I thought it was more polite than putting it in capitals.
Actually bold was set for the blue high lighted bit I was quoting

 

[Number 1 is Colin Bell]

Steve Coogan is the only 'celebrity' I'm disappointed with, all the other labour supporters are vermin.

I've just seen his party political broadcast for the first time... I think he was brought up near De La Salle in Middleton wasn't he?

I guess if Labour don't get in and things don't suit him hen he can simply fuck off to LA....

The Luxury of being a Champaign Socialist

They don't have to live with the consequences.

He has money and votes Labour! Disgraceful! The naughty boy!

 

[TangerineSteve17]

and Multi millionaire so he has a lot in common with Red Ed so he is going with the party that acts in his best interests.

PS Has anyone checked if his voice synthesizer has been hacked by rascal?

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

 

[DelToro]

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

Bang on.

There's nothing worse than a self deprecating 60k.

Give me a good old fashioned bold as brass big talking 60k any day of the week.

 

[Scottyboi]

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

He constantly chats shit, can't wait for his meltdown when Labour get in power.

 

[whp.blue]

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

I would imagine there are quite a few posters on here that earn way in excess of that figure.
And It has to support a family so it is not for one person is it

 

[malg]

Coogan's a Rag, so he can eat shit.

 

[SWP's back]

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

Bang on.

There's nothing worse than a self deprecating 60k.

Give me a good old fashioned bold as brass big talking 60k any day of the week.

First the first quarter. Maybe. Net.

 

[law74]

So if the poor are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests, and now the rich are voting for Labour because it's in their best interests then doesn't this mean that Labour are in the best interests of most of the country?

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

In Tory land £60,000 per annum is almost working class, in the real world, I would say it would fall in the upper middle class bracket (speaking as a house owning, car driving worker earning around £26,000 per annum dealing with legislation every working day, and often with solicitors and Barristers, who i am lead to believe earn considerably more than me)

 

[squirtyflower]

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

I would imagine there are quite a few posters on here that earn way in excess of that figure.
And It has to support a family so it is not for one person is it

Not just supporting one family, but supporting the families of others too as they dont

 

[Bluemanc100]

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

He constantly chats shit, can't wait for his meltdown when Labour get in power.

Patient then?

 

[TangerineSteve17]

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

Bang on.

There's nothing worse than a self deprecating 60k.

Give me a good old fashioned bold as brass big talking 60k any day of the week.

I'll make it bold for you.

I don't think he meant daily though. That's Joe Hart money. But he's worth it.

 

[Lucky13]

Anyone who cares what someone earns is an idiot.

 

[whp.blue]

Yes if you fall into one of two groups

1: Multi millionaires like Hawkings and Red Ed. They have enough money to ride out a Labour Government and can make that back Buying up property at knock down prices during the enevitable economic melt down that follows a Labour Government.
2: People on Benefits everyone knows Labour will look after them

No
If you are working and own a home and or a car. This group will be hardest hit under the economic meltdown as they do not have the buffer of loads of cash to ride it out and where do you think the cheap properties come from? Also these are the people who will be hit by Labours profligate spending anyone who has worked hard and risen their pay to a modest £60k + or so will end up being hammered by Red Ed
and these are not even middle class ffs

A modest 60k+? For one person?

Either you or I are not in the real world. I hope it's me really.

In Tory land £60,000 per annum is almost working class, in the real world, I would say it would fall in the upper middle class bracket (speaking as a house owning, car driving worker earning around £26,000 per annum dealing with legislation every working day, and often with solicitors and Barristers, who i am lead to believe earn considerably more than me)

Upper middle class my arse self employed people quite often work 70 hours a week and that equates to a very modest £16.50 an hour
Anyone working 70 hours or more cannot be any thing other than working class in any ones world.

 

[TangerineSteve17]

Anyone who cares what someone earns is an idiot.

Come now, that is a silly statement. How do you value your own worth if you don't care what others are earning? It's relative to your experience.