gordondaviesmoustache said:
If I in any way represent the 'typical' floating voter then marshaling Tony Blair into the election debate was probably a mistake on Labour's part.
I used to quite like him and think domestically he did a lot of good. I also think up to 9/11 his judgement on foreign affairs was sound, but that event and the success he'd enjoyed prosecuting a military campaign in Kosovo and the sense of righteousness that seemed to engender in him, warped his capacity to properly consider the UK's best interests. He lost sight of his job description.
Whatever way you want to analyse it, Iraq was the big call of his Prime Ministership and he royally fucked it up. It was, and remains, an utter fucking abortion.
Leaders should always be judged on the big decisions they have to make and in that regard Tony Blair was all too sadly lacking.
For that reason, to some extent at least, I now think he's a bit of a wanker.
I'm sure the journey I've been on isn't a solitary one.
As one of the more intelligent nutjobs that inhabit this den of far right iniquity i expected more from you my friend. Sadly you appear to have taken the myopic stereotypical view of Blair that is prevalent in todays media.
Blair ultimatly dissappointed me but for reasons other than Iraq. He was far too right wing for a start in my eyes but his Government did much good and really did transform parts of our nation. In my view he will over time be seen as a superb Prime Minister and he was and still is a supreme orator and political operator. Nobody around today comes close to him.
His successes in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Northern Ireland are all forgotten and his part in Iraq is magnified to such an extant it is now unclear as to what, why and when really happened. 9/11 no doubt changed the world and any British PM in power that day would have had to react as he did. He is revered in the USA for his actions as he stood shoulder to shoulder with a grieving nation and offered the firm backing of the "old country" to its greatest friend and prodigy. I would argue it was almost impossible not to go to war with Iraq once Bush and his Republican hawks had decided that was the course of action that they would persue. Its now almost forgotten that the Tory party almost to a man backed Blair whilst the Labour party did not. And it was not just us that fought alongside the USA, it was a coalition of countries, yet Blair always appears as the man to shoulder the most blame. History may show that the real failure was not removing Saddam in the first Gulf war when public opinion supported it and the second gulf war was inevitable due to that failure of the our political leaders of the day.
As for Blairs appearence today, he reminded me somewhat nostalgically of the days of 97, when he was seen as the great hope for Labour. He is still a brilliant communicator and i doubt he will damage Ed Miliband as much as people think because he not only shows Ed to be a pale shadow of himself, he shows the public that all our party leaders are nowhere near to his standard.
Saying all this i would not vote for Blair in the upcoming election, not because of his supposed crimes but because he is too right wing for my tastes. :))