You are so vulgar.Is it worth watching then? Any shagging?
For those not wearing their reading specs Harry is the one on the left.Seeing as this "Royal Circus" continues, is it not unreasonable to request that Harry takes a DNA test to establish as to whether he actually descends from Royal blood - or not!
View attachment 63681
Verification not required.Seeing as this "Royal Circus" continues, is it not unreasonable to request that Harry takes a DNA test to establish as to whether he actually descends from Royal blood - or not!
View attachment 63681
Deffo a potential Netflix series there!Seeing as this "Royal Circus" continues, is it not unreasonable to request that Harry takes a DNA test to establish as to whether he actually descends from Royal blood - or not!
View attachment 63681
Seeing as this "Royal Circus" continues, is it not unreasonable to request that Harry takes a DNA test to establish as to whether he actually descends from Royal blood - or not!
View attachment 63681
Bet you're excited about Santa coming in ten days too ;-)Noticed this has surfaced a lot lately - good distraction from the bot brigade to divert attention away from the excellent Netflix doc
Anyhow, there’s more comparisons feature wise with Harry and Charles - can see in the nose and eyes
Also, in the Spencer family on Diana’s side, the red hair gene is common. Her brother, Earl Spencer, and sister, Lady Sarah McCorquodale, are both redheads.
Besides, Harry is not the only redhead in his family. His cousin, Princess Beatrice, also has red hair. Her parents are Charles’ brother, the Duke of York, and Sarah Ferguson. Other members of the royal family have also historically had red hair, including King George V
So Charles and Diana both had the necessary genes to produce a red head.
Can both statements not be true? I’m pretty indifferent to both but can see how it’s possible to be anti royal yet have some time for Harry.I'm loving the "I-hate-the-Royal-Family-but-there-are-two-Royals-I-really-REALLY-like!" arguments.