The Harry and Meghan fuss

so a restatement of their position with more detail.
to achieve what?

To achieve the backlash Clarkson is getting - the abuse and bile from the right wing press has always been accepted but this doc has changed peoples opinions and many are saying enough is enough
 
To achieve the backlash Clarkson is getting - the abuse and bile from the right wing press has always been accepted but this doc has changed peoples opinions and many are saying enough is enough

if that was their goal then fair enough
what evidence do you have that this was their goal?
 
You don't have views on people that you have never met? You mentioned flame wars and the ridiculousness of your statement suggests that Charlie or the palace are flaming those 2 on social media.

Nothing will shut those two up in pursuit of victimhood or money and the King and the palace are not joining in so it isn't a flame war is it?
Hi Piers. Or is it Jeremy? Or Kelvin?
 
They say that’s the reason so you can either believe or not believe but, thats the feeling I get from watching it.

thank you

thats all i was asking

if that is what they say they are doing, then i understand.

i have very little interest in the royal family, so have watched neither the oprah interview nor the netflix series. its not just harry and Meghan, i also didnt watch the queens funeral or recent jubilee celebrations.
i only followed any of it via the news (mainly bbc and c4). From my outside perspective i couldnt see what they were trying to achieve. as i say thanks for the explanation.
 
Looks like Clarkson and the Sun have validated their claims.
How ?

If I had any doubts about H&M and their version of events in the Netflix thing, Clarkson has proven to me that they have been truthful regards the English media.
To want a woman to be forced to walk naked through towns and have shit thrown at her is grotesque.
He hates her more than Rose West, a child murderer.

Imagine if he was saying that about your wife/mother/daughter.
 
Nope wrong again, you think that someone should apologise or condemn publicly an act committed by a person not being them.

Weird set of values there fella, oh as for MM can't stand the grifting shrew and think even less of her gimpish partner.
They could certainly condemn it, they don’t have to apologise no, but at the end of the day a disgusting article has been written about a member of their family by an odious turd and it could have been shot down instantly and just maybe it would have served as a warning to others.


Also as an aside, Clarkson write an article many years ago about how he was unable to watch his son play rugby or football because as soon as other parents worked out which one was his son he’d be bullied on the field physically, other parents would be telling their kids to rough him up more so instead he’d watch from far away and not make him a target.


The irony of it all, done for nothing more than attention and cash.
 
Last edited:
thank you

thats all i was asking

if that is what they say they are doing, then i understand.

i have very little interest in the royal family, so have watched neither the oprah interview nor the netflix series. its not just harry and Meghan, i also didnt watch the queens funeral or recent jubilee celebrations.
i only followed any of it via the news (mainly bbc and c4). From my outside perspective i couldnt see what they were trying to achieve. as i say thanks for the explanation.

I never in my wildest dreams thought I’d watch it but my wife put it on & saw it. It’s worth a watch. It’s a great watch on the unfairness of the media & politics whether it business or family.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.