kaz7
Well-Known Member
Theyhave their deals , they have their money , charity will benefit in the futureWe all know there was no fee at the time but that does not rule out financial gain in the future.
Theyhave their deals , they have their money , charity will benefit in the futureWe all know there was no fee at the time but that does not rule out financial gain in the future.
There are rarely fees when celebrities talk to the press. But are you saying that if Robert Downey Jr went on Graham Norton and happened to spend 5 minutes talking about his new film, he wouldn't be doing it for any financial benefit because he wasn't being paid to be on the show?THERE WAS NO FEE
Haha, outwitted by the weather presenter, that's funny.It was a joy to watch - a thing of great beauty. Moron being lectured by a man of colour and not being able to take it ha ha ha ha - hope he gets fucking sacked.
There might not have been any fee and that actually adds to the kudos and helps their public relations. They might not have earnt directly from the interview but it will increase their public profile, which will in turn increase the value of of any deal they strike in future.THERE WAS NO FEE
They are not selling a film ,they have had ,in harrys case a lifetime of not being able to speak out , they have had a horrific time since before the wedding , nobody should not be able to tell their truth and put things like racism and mental health top of the agenda , we know the royal family are dysfunctinal and cruel, the queen as much as i love and respect her duty , cried in public when her yaught ( sp) , boat , was scrapped but not when watching dianas casket go byThere are rarely fees when celebrities talk to the press. But are you saying that if Robert Downey Jr went on Graham Norton and happened to spend 5 minutes talking about his new film, he wouldn't be doing it for any financial benefit because he wasn't being paid to be on the show?
THERE WAS NO FEE
They got more publicity from this than any celebrity could possible dream of.There are rarely fees when celebrities talk to the press. But are you saying that if Robert Downey Jr went on Graham Norton and happened to spend 5 minutes talking about his new film, he wouldn't be doing it for any financial benefit because he wasn't being paid to be on the show?
I don't disagree, but the "they took no fee" line is irrelevant and not a reason why someone isn't doing something for their own benefit, financial or otherwise.They are not selling a film ,they have had ,in harrys case a lifetime of not being able to speak out , they have had a horrific time since before the wedding , nobody should not be able to tell their truth and put things like racism and mental health top of the agenda , we know the royal family are dysfunctinal and cruel, the queen as much as i love and respect her duty , cried in public when her yaught ( sp) , boat , was scrapped but not when watching dianas casket go by
they are tightly controlled , you are born or married into it and you ha e to stick to endless rules and take cruel shit without reacting
diana exposed it for what it is and they learnt absolutely nothing
Then why did Harry allow the woman he supposedly loves to come into that environment? Because he thought that (with her help) they could change centuries of process and protocol... Sounds hard to believe.. Surely worth of a filmThey are not selling a film ,they have had ,in harrys case a lifetime of not being able to speak out , they have had a horrific time since before the wedding , nobody should not be able to tell their truth and put things like racism and mental health top of the agenda , we know the royal family are dysfunctinal and cruel, the queen as much as i love and respect her duty , cried in public when her yaught ( sp) , boat , was scrapped but not when watching dianas casket go by
they are tightly controlled , you are born or married into it and you ha e to stick to endless rules and take cruel shit without reacting
diana exposed it for what it is and they learnt absolutely nothing