The Harry and Meghan fuss

Blue and true said:
The two are the same grotesque entity though. He's already stated his belief that his family were colluding with the press to arm a slander salvo against his wife; with the adulteress seemingly being the instigator. Their "say nothing" policy has worsened the sorry episode; one carefully and compassionately worded statement could have defused the situation. It needn't have been a public statement. They've got the far-right on their puppet strings, that much is obvious.
Click to expand...
True, I won't get the forum in trouble, but 5 minutes on twitter (Giles Coren I'm looking at you) would point you to a lot of journalists who have open knowledge of a affair in the Royal family.

The faustian pact that seems to have been signed is feed him an Meghan to the press to keep other damaging stories our of the paper. I still think, that he speaks too generally, name names and put the spotlight on the "royal reporters" and sources in the Palace the former are not real journalists and the latter are parasites. Perfect example, in the interview he mentions Clarkson, take 5 minutes and say this guy was at lunch with my mother law despite writing that shit about my wife. This might seem too on the nose, but there is still so many people who don't understand this complicity.
 
Marlo said:
True, I won't get the forum in trouble, but 5 minutes on twitter (Giles Coren I'm looking at you) would point you to a lot of journalists who have open knowledge of a affair in the Royal family.

The faustian pact that seems to have been signed is feed him an Meghan to the press to keep other damaging stories our of the paper. I still think, that he speaks too generally, name names and put the spotlight on the "royal reporters" and sources in the Palace the former are not real journalists and the latter are parasites. Perfect example, in the interview he mentions Clarkson, take 5 minutes and say this guy was at lunch with my mother law despite writing that shit about my wife. This might seem too on the nose, but there is still so many people who don't understand this complicity.
Click to expand...
Spot on, and Faustian pact is a good description. H&M either don't want to play or are tring to play it from both sides as it were which is a dangerous game.
 
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese said:
Do you think that might be a slight generalisation? Royalists aren't just the west side RW tabloid rogues gallery mentioned above. I imagine they will also include a lot of charity workers and others who are far from ugly inside.
Maybe it's people like us poking holes in the royals and wanting to fire people from cannons that are ugly inside?
Click to expand...
The difference is, those charity workers and others you alluded to aren't the ones continuing a media attack on Meghan for no reason. The anger this woman has inspired in some of our commentariat, even before they cut themselves from the tumour that is the monarchy, borders on psychosis. I mean, have you actually read some of the shite Piers Morgan has said about her? Tweets about her on a daily basis; a trend that has continued for years now. It's irrational hatred. And you can say the same for those other words removed.

It's this simple, and this point has nothing to do with me being a republican: if I was in any institution that wielded the kind of power the monarchy had, and my wife was being continually bullied by the press, and my family were sitting by and letting it happen, then you better fucking believe I'd take her out of harm's way and leave. If I were then to find out my family were collaborating with the press to drip feed these attacks, then I'd return the favour and go nuclear on my family. That's what any real fucking man would do, not pander to an archaic institution that quite literally belongs in the middle ages.

Harry went nuclear. Go figure.
 
I suppose the question is the people getting angry about Prince Harry writing a book and making money about Prince Harry using his journalistic source - Prince Harry - is getting your goat you need to ask yourself why - normally sources are protected and probably for sound reasons
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.