Cant think of a bigger list of people I want to ignore. In fact, thinking on it, add Trump and that is almost bingo, including the Harry and his wife subject matter. And yes, this is the first and last time Ill ever read the thread and thereby comment on itWhen you realise that those lining up against Meghan include Morgan, Clarkson, Wootton, Hartley-Brewer and Farage, I can with reasonable confidence support her side of the argument without even having to listen to her.
I agree. I was amazed at how collaborative it was.He’s absolutely destroyed the British Press and how it operates with the Royal institution- that is the best thing to come out of the interview for me, I genuinely didn’t know how intertwined they was.
Some, yes. All? Unlikely.
It’s absolutely clear that Harry is vulnerable and domineered. A lot of people don’t admire those types of relationship and turn against either one or both parties.
There’s something of a parallel with the Beckhams, where both individuals are revered by many and derided by many.
Race isn’t always the prime motivator, even though that suits some agendas.
I’m sure you are already wanking yourself daft because you think you’ve made a clever comment.Throw trump in there too and you'd be wanking yourself daft. You are a tabloid headline writers wet dream.
The two are the same grotesque entity though. He's already stated his belief that his family were colluding with the press to arm a slander salvo against his wife; with the adulteress seemingly being the instigator. Their "say nothing" policy has worsened the sorry episode; one carefully and compassionately worded statement could have defused the situation. It needn't have been a public statement. They've got the far-right on their puppet strings, that much is obvious.I agree. I was amazed at how collaborative it was.
This is where I think he misses a trick. If he turned his ire away from his family an just kept hammering the Daily Mail/Mirror. I was not aware he is suing them for phone hacking. He has Piers Morgan giving him shit, this bloke was hacking a murdered teenagers phone. Martin Bashir, falsifying documents to trick his mother into interviews. Don't attack the monarchy which is a British institution, but go after the press with a laser focus. Name names, point out the link between the journalist and Palace aides.
You could do with an anti vax and Elon musk angle too tbf, before you get the Kleenex out - surely not too much of a stretch to get Joe Rogan and Putin in there too?I’m sure you are already wanking yourself daft because you think you’ve made a clever comment.
Unfortunately it makes little sense to me and I have no clue what you’re on about. Why would I be a tabloid headline writers wet dream? And I had no idea that Trump had commented on them like the rest of those I mentioned so why would I include him?
Generally the way with the tabloids etc though isn't it? - we see similar with the symbiotic relationship some football clubs have with them.The two are the same grotesque entity though. He's already stated his belief that his family were colluding with the press to arm a slander salvo against his wife; with the adulteress seemingly being the instigator. Their "say nothing" policy has worsened the sorry episode; one carefully and compassionately worded statement could have defused the situation. It needn't have been a public statement. They've got the far-right on their puppet strings, that much is obvious.
You could do with an anti vax and Elon musk angle too tbf, before you get the Kleenex out - surely not too much of a stretch to get Joe Rogan and Putin in there too?
No, maybe a new username would help ;-)Have you considered that you might need a new hobby mate?