zeven said:Mancini is now a legend, FA cup and the TITLE. for me he is untouchable right now.
btw. back at ragcafe there is a thread http://www.redcafe.net/f7/roberto-mancini-would-you-keep-sack-him-353686/
I try to understand their logic. They say Mancini is shit manager because we did not run away with the title. So according to some of them, its Mancinis fault Their own team were able to get 89 points. its Mancinis fault that United did so well
How they cant see the flaw in their logic is quite funny.
In their world they should thank Mancini for their good season, now i will take a public thanks from united as granted or they are very ungrateful
I've heard this pathetic excuse several times now, even last night by Shaka Hislop or whatever his name is on ESPN and I wonder if those that keep repeating it have even thought it through. I didn't know that there was a rule that if you spend x amount of money in a window you have to be y amount of points ahead team z in second place before you get any credit for winning the title. It suggests that if City finished on 80 points in first and the second team finished lets say 72 points in second that would be more impressive because of the 8 point gap even though 89 points is actually more. How are City responsible for how well the second placed team does? There were two games between the two teams in the league over the course of the season and City won comfortably on both occasions, the other 36 games were obviously out of their hands. It does not even take into account the big and dodgy decisions that swung games in their favour and won them points they shouldn't have won which got them level on points in the first place but that's another matter.