Brewster's millions
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 3,810
Yeah but his Dad worked in a factory, so he can’t be a bullshitter, cor blimey Guvnor!
Same issue applies, be economical with the truth and influence the data. Honestly though how you or anyone can believe what the Tories say after the last government's constant disinformation beggers belief.What about the IFS One?
What about being told the full picture from Treasury officials?
Tgen we have the difference between today's statement and tge figures signed of by Senior Civil Servants on 17th July?
Yeah but his Dad worked in a factory, so he can’t be a bullshitter, cor blimey Guvnor!
Taking money off pensioners because of 46 billion black hole badYeah but his Dad worked in a factory, so he can’t be a bullshitter, cor blimey Guvnor!
I’m over 80 live alone, pay for everything myself, including essential alterations I needed to be able to stay living alone and looking after myself.Pointless mate. Yes I'm sure eighty year old Ethel wants to spend her final years living with a lodger. Also overlooking the fact if she took one in they'd cut her benefits.
Now don't be silly.The old quote someone on shitloads of money to justify taking it off someone just above the line, spin spin spin. How Tory of you.
Now don't be silly.
It's £5 a week, still to be paid to the poorest pensioners, after £36 a week increase over the last two years.
If there wasn't the constant demand that chancellors rule out income tax rises, we could maintain universal benefits (and increase pensions generally) and take it back in tax by raising the rates of tax on those with higher incomes (pensioners included). I think a 1% increase on the higher rate would have been an alternative to means-testing the winter fuel payment.
That £36 a week is not enough...............you try living on 200 quid a week pal.Now don't be silly.
It's £5 a week, still to be paid to the poorest pensioners, after £36 a week increase over the last two years.
If there wasn't the constant demand that chancellors rule out income tax rises, we could maintain universal benefits (and increase pensions generally) and take it back in tax by raising the rates of tax on those with higher incomes (pensioners included). I think a 1% increase on the higher rate would have been an alternative to means-testing the winter fuel payment.
When people are asked about paying more tax for better services most say they are happy to, it is a media and government myth most in society are afraid of tax rises, it it those best off who peddle it becasue they want lower tax and to contribute less.Now don't be silly.
It's £5 a week, still to be paid to the poorest pensioners, after £36 a week increase over the last two years.
If there wasn't the constant demand that chancellors rule out income tax rises, we could maintain universal benefits (and increase pensions generally) and take it back in tax by raising the rates of tax on those with higher incomes (pensioners included). I think a 1% increase on the higher rate would have been an alternative to means-testing the winter fuel payment.