The Labour Government

Eccles Blue said:
Does it say anywhere that he has discarded it? If he has just taken it down from the rooms he uses and had it put somewhere else fair enough. It doesn't say he threw it out does it?
Don't they have a gallery of ex-Prime Ministers going up a staircase or three? If so why wasn't it there and there would be no need to move it? It would blend in with all the others.
Why is she any different from the rest? Just asking.

If I don't like a painting in my house I take it down and either send it to a charity shop or give it away. Occasionally I would put it in a room I don't use very often, the spare bedroom. (After a few years I do like a turn around of paintings.)

Personally I would have taken it down the moment I saw it but then I do still turn the TV over if I see anything about her on TV. But that's just me. :-)
Click to expand...
I think the ideal solution would to have privatised the painting and sold it to the highest bidder.

It’s what she would have wanted.
 
Eccles Blue said:
Boris would bid and then get someone else to pay for it!!
Click to expand...
You mean like Starmer’s suits?
His net worth is circa £8m. He’s on £170K a year with free board and lodgings and he’s Ok with some arse licker donor buying him his suits. You really do have to chuckle.
 
Bluemanc100 said:
It's a fucking disgrace... You can hate the woman for her politics, her actions or her principles but she has every right to have a portrait hanging in No.10... Taking it down is a mark of the man or he's trying to point score
Click to expand...

According to the article Starmer didn’t even think about until his autobiographer said about it. Man can’t think for himself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.