stonerblue
Well-Known Member
I was asking @PPT the question after he labelled the upcoming £400 increase in state pension as 'peanuts'.I guess it’s not peanuts to the recipients that only just fall outside the arbitrary line where is not longer receivable.
The worst of it is that those who have paid their full stamp and don’t have any other previsions fall outside and those who haven’t contributed do. So you can theoretically end up in a situation where those who haven’t potentially worked a day in their life being better off than someone who hasn’t had a day on the dole - and that is inherently unjust.
I have been piss poor a few times in life so i know four hundred quid can be a lot of money.
You've summed the whole thing up in your next paragraph.
Despite ppt's stats, the whole benefit system generally remains fair. We all know the guy/girl/family who is taking the piss and playing the system, and if you don't they're not hard to spot. But in the great scheme they are a miniscule proprtion of the benefit receiving majority. Using these wankers to 'model' the system or moan that's it's not fair is ridiculous.
This 'hostile enviroment' attitude (cheers Pritti) is not the way to run the system, nor is it a good look for those that dont receive any benefits to piss and whinge about. Yes its fucking annoying when i see someone sat in the pub all day every day that hasn't done proper work for decades bragging about their next holiday, but out of all the people i share my locals with there's 3 of them i can name.