meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 6,993
.
It did got down. The 50p rate was introduced in April 2010 as reflected in the 2010-11 figures below, from the HMRC. Look what happened.
Now some of the tax in 2009-10 was due to people hurriedly paying themselves more in that year, in order to avoid the 50% in the following year**. So the effect is exaggerated. But look at 2008-09 as well, still much higher (with a max 45% rate) than 2010-11 with the 50%. Even in 2011-12, at 50% it was still bringing in less.
** which kind of proves my point: A lot of wealthy people have flexibility in their earnings and can rearrange their affairs in order to reduce their tax bills, if rates get too penal.
View attachment 132832
The overall tax revenue didn’t, that chart won’t show that. The OBR report when they changed it back in 2012 is what you want to look at, it went up by 0.6 billion rather than the 2-3 billion they thought it would. Taking it back to 45% subsequently only made a difference of 0.1 billion.
I’m agreeing with your sentiment btw (although personally I’d still up it to 50% even though it impacts me). It needs to be in conjunction with other measures too though.