P
P
PPT
Guest
How else did they end the strikes?Really, so why did it take Labour to do that
How else did they end the strikes?Really, so why did it take Labour to do that
They sat down and negotiatedHow else did they end the strikes?
They didn’t negotiate, they simply gave them what they asked for.They sat down and negotiated
Wasn’t it 35% they wanted?, don’t recall them getting this.They didn’t negotiate, they simply gave them what they asked for.
It was a nice cosy little agreement that they would strike before the election, back up the waiting lists and then get what they wanted when Labour got in.
We're you in the negotiations?They didn’t negotiate, they simply gave them what they asked for.
It was a nice cosy little agreement that they would strike before the election, back up the waiting lists and then get what they wanted when Labour got in.
Hang their heads in shame for not accepting a spurious 35% pay rise demand, set at a deliberately extortionate level so that an agreement wouldn’t take place?Wasn’t it 35% they wanted?, don’t recall them getting this.
Here nor there really as the cost to the country of continuing strikes was much worse and something the Tories should hang their heads in shame allowing to continue
Begs the obvious question; if the plans are so transformative, and require concessions from the unions, then why didn’t the government link these to the pay deal they’ve just signed off?We're you in the negotiations?
I know someone who was. Their plans for GBR are very radical and will appear in the public domain in January when we go back in to negotiate for the next deal. They've given the unions heads up for what they expect. There's no such thing as beer and sandwiches at number 10 anymore.
Hang their head in shame for making no attempt to resolve the dispute.Hang their heads in shame for not accepting a spurious 35% pay rise demand, set at a deliberately extortionate level so that an agreement wouldn’t take place?
Yeah, disgraceful isn’t it?