urban genie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,618
you mean Edward Peter Bertram Savile Foljambe?We all know it’s really the Earl of Liverpool’s fault, barring him. He claims he is the victim and that it wasn’t his fault.
you mean Edward Peter Bertram Savile Foljambe?We all know it’s really the Earl of Liverpool’s fault, barring him. He claims he is the victim and that it wasn’t his fault.
I was meaning Banks Jenkinson, but Edward also probably thinks he is the victim.you mean Edward Peter Bertram Savile Foljambe?
Let's see if your "if" materialises
tories were still blaming brown government 14 years after their own fuck ups so pot kettlse and all that guff
Starmer, who is alrady being called a stooge of lobbyists and the rwp are pushing the he hates the common person angle on him.
The 1billion figure is a lie and again was pushed by a rw gobshite to show labour up as anti-business, the majority of the public agree P&O are cunts the investment angle wouldn't damage labour in the public eye, backing a bad employer over your ministers though does
The way they treated employees was disgraceful. Labour are bringing in legislation to outlaw it. Well done Labour, it’s good legislation. It’s done, the battle is won.
It is politically naive to then call them a rogue company (apparently a different word to describe them had been signed off by No 10) and encourage people to boycott them. A better statement would have been “we’ve brought through legislation to bring an end to some of the less acceptable practices we’ve seen in recent years and I look forward to working with P&O in the future” (assuming she was asked a direct question about P&O).
Starmer isn’t backing her. So if Starmer sacks her (aka she resigns) who are you going to back/ criticise? Will Starmer be wrong? Or will Haigh be in the wrong for saying it?
I know it's different when you're in power but Shapps went "rogue" and even Johnson didn't sound keen on what P&O did, but Starmer’s problem here is... well, what Starmer said at the time.
Viewed from afar, they seem to be suffering from a series of self inflicted PR gaffes. How would you mark them so far; 6.5, maybe 7 out of 10?
If Starmer is in a position where he needs a cabinet reshuffle after only 100 days in power, he’s got more problems than he thinks he has. It would be a clear admission of political incompetence.There is zero wrong with what he said at the time or has done on this since they got to power. It’s consistent. Like you say there is a difference being in power as your words matter. Anyroad Sky are saying DP will attend next weeks investment summit so let’s see if it rumbles on or not.
Haigh has had her rebuke and maybe that’ll be the end of it. Of course the Sunday political programmes will be full of questions about it but I suppose it’s a break for them from questions on Taylor Swift tickets. Be a good test for Starmer how he navigates this - especially as his new top team are controlling the communication. The quick distancing No 10 from the comments felt different to how things were handled before - we will get a sense of how ruthless they plan to be if Haigh is still in a job in a couple of weeks. I read Starmer was being pressed by his new team to reorganise his cabinet but I can’t see them rushing in to that given it’ll look poor.