Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,873
It's just an endless circulation of the same money. No one is earning any money
Why are you still here? Can't you just admit you misread something?
It's just an endless circulation of the same money. No one is earning any money
Flat feet?I escaped the war by the slimmest of margins.
Before we go any further, what's the source either for the 25m or the 15.75m?You’re wrong. It’s not 25m, it’s much lower. 15.75m of tax payers are not dependent on the state (through direct and indirect benefits). That’s 23.5% of the entire population.
Our net dependency ratio for tax payers is 58% and that isn’t sustainable if we want to do anything other than exist as a nation slowly spiralling to oblivion. We need bold ideas, growth is great and necessary but moreover we just need salaries to rise more quickly than inflation so we can reduce in work benefits but how you do that without causing inflation or making the public sector too fat - given that’s the only pay the government controls and you can only employ so many people if pay is more attractive in the public sector. Maybe a new corporation tax for profits in companies where the median salary is below £xx,xxx would work - I’d like to see something like that as this topic boils my piss. It’s certainly going to take some nifty tricks to stave off a world that demands quick fixes.
Can Labour do it? I don’t know. I don’t know how much they see it as the problem but the noises I’ve heard in the last couple of weeks indicate they might well do. I hope they can as it’s in all our interests.
Some of it sounds good. Quite a bit of it sounds like a continuation of conservative policies.
Just turned 41?I escaped the war by the slimmest of margins.
Sure you did, I'll leave you to your obsessive behaviour with a couple of posters, it's both mature and riveting:-)I did, you just either can’t or won’t see it. Anyway, it’s too much like hard work, so I’ll leave you to your sarky comments.
Before we go any further, what's the source either for the 25m or the 15.75m?
I thought the 25m was taxpayers in the private sector. What does your "not dependent on the state" mean? Does that inlcude recipients of child benefit? (Do two parents count as two recipients?)
Why are you still here? Can't you just admit you misread something?
Calm the fuck down !The work from home wankers will feel event more empowered - we are fucked! I am telling you we are fucked.
Calm the fuck down !
It's an interesting policy as the headline figure of 6,500 teachers sounds impressive until you are told that there are over 32k schools in the UK. So roughly 1 in 5 schools will receive one additional teacher and whilst it is a start it's like pissing in the wind. The other issue is of course that the stats show that maybe 20% of pupils who are currently at private schools will move to state schools so around 100 - 120k pupils. Each pupil costs just under £8k per annum so whilst the policy will raise some money, according to Labour's own figures 65% will be lost, whilst according to the Tories the figure will be 123% meaning the policy will cost the country money as opposed to raising it. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.vat on private schools wankers
It's an interesting policy as the headline figure of 6,500 teachers sounds impressive until you are told that there are over 32k schools in the UK. So roughly 1 in 5 schools will receive one additional teacher and whilst it is a start it's like pissing in the wind. The other issue is of course that the stats show that maybe 20% of pupils who are currently at private schools will move to state schools so around 100 - 120k pupils. Each pupil costs just under £8k per annum so whilst the policy will raise some money, according to Labour's own figures 65% will be lost, whilst according to the Tories the figure will be 123% meaning the policy will cost the country money as opposed to raising it. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
I'm talkin' WW2 not the Gulf War!!!Just turned 41?
Yeah, I could never fire straight wi' these feet.Flat feet?