The Labour Government

111,000 asylum claims in one year is ridiculous and completely unsustainable. The majority coming across illegally in small boats and lots of them not genuine refugees.

The government need to get a grip of this. I think the general public has had enough of it and in particular feeling like we have no control of our borders

I dred to think the backlash when they aren’t allowed to use hotels and instead use private homes or council homes to house them.
So for accuracy there were 49000 irregular arrivals in the period you refer to. 49000 is not a majority of 111000. It is the processing of them that determines whether they are genuine refugees.

You're right though that they do need to get a grip. What do you suggest within the boundaries of international law?
 
Last edited:
All Governments run debt. We have had higher debt to GDP ratios in the past. Over 150% in the 1920’s and 30’s. Over 200% after WWII. Our present position is not insurmountable.

So after two world wars we had higher debt? That's not particularly reassuring. Most people would accept that debt to finance fighting an existential threat to the nation is regrettable, but understandable.

This idea that government spending during peacetime, can and should be financed by debt is why we're in the situation we're in today. Big mistake giving politicians a blank cheque.

I don't agree that our debt levels are no big deal, in fact they are unsustainable, we are reaching the point where we are running out of buyers for our debt, which sends the rate higher, costing the government even more to service.

This is what's known as a debt doom loop, as the government borrows more, the bond markets require higher rates, which costs the government more, which means the government borrows more, etc, etc.

We've already reached the stage where servicing debt is a significant portion of government spending and this gets worse until we address this issue by cutting spending. If we don't do this voluntarily we're looking at a debt crisis eventually and then we're in for a world of pain.
 
So after two world wars we had higher debt? That's not particularly reassuring. Most people would accept that debt to finance fighting an existential threat to the nation is regrettable, but understandable.

This idea that government spending during peacetime, can and should be financed by debt is why we're in the situation we're in today. Big mistake giving politicians a blank cheque.

I don't agree that our debt levels are no big deal, in fact they are unsustainable, we are reaching the point where we are running out of buyers for our debt, which sends the rate higher, costing the government even more to service.

This is what's known as a debt doom loop, as the government borrows more, the bond markets require higher rates, which costs the government more, which means the government borrows more, etc, etc.

We've already reached the stage where servicing debt is a significant portion of government spending and this gets worse until we address this issue by cutting spending. If we don't do this voluntarily we're looking at a debt crisis eventually and then we're in for a world of pain.

Yes. We’ve also had the financial crash in 2008, a major disruption to our industrial and foreign policy with Brexit followed by political instability in its wake, a global pandemic and a major war in Europe. Events have a major impact on our finances. Right now there is an unnecessary trade war, shifting of global supply lines and a US administration imposing a cost of living crisis on their own people via a sales tax and impacting our exports.

What the UK and the world needs is a period of calm stability. Instead we have people trying to burn everything down with zero clue on how to replace it. Make politics boring again, give business stability and certainty on what the trading environment will look like a year or two years from now and you will be pleasantly surprised.

If we keep encouraging or voting for chaos all you will get is more chaos.
 
So for accuracy there were 49000 irregular arrivals in the period you refer to. 49000 is not a majority of 111000. It is the processing of them that determines whether they are not genuine refugees.

You're right though that they do need to get a grip. What do you suggest within the boundaries of international law?
Fair enough. It’s still too high either way.

Unfortunately I don’t have the answers. Perhaps we do need to review and look at changing some of the European convention on human rights laws or at least the laws in place that stop us deporting people.
 
Fair enough. It’s still too high either way.

Unfortunately I don’t have the answers. Perhaps we do need to review and look at changing some of the European convention on human rights laws or at least the laws in place that stop us deporting people.

Human rights either apply to everyone or no one. I never understood this desire of people to deprive themselves of their rights.

Oh, and we already deport people.
 
Yes. We’ve also had the financial crash in 2008, a major disruption to our industrial and foreign policy with Brexit followed by political instability in its wake, a global pandemic and a major war in Europe. Events have a major impact on our finances. Right now there is an unnecessary trade war, shifting of global supply lines and a US administration imposing a cost of living crisis on their own people via a sales tax and impacting our exports.

What the UK and the world needs is a period of calm stability. Instead we have people trying to burn everything down with zero clue on how to replace it. Make politics boring again, give business stability and certainty on what the trading environment will look like a year or two years from now and you will be pleasantly surprised.

If we keep encouraging or voting for chaos all you will get is more chaos.

Yeah coz voting for Tories and Labour did so well until.we voted in....... oh right erm

Truly inspirational post btw

Business stability

We can only hope for such a wonderland

Pmsl.
 
Yes. We’ve also had the financial crash in 2008, a major disruption to our industrial and foreign policy with Brexit followed by political instability in its wake, a global pandemic and a major war in Europe. Events have a major impact on our finances. Right now there is an unnecessary trade war, shifting of global supply lines and a US administration imposing a cost of living crisis on their own people via a sales tax and impacting our exports.

What the UK and the world needs is a period of calm stability. Instead we have people trying to burn everything down with zero clue on how to replace it. Make politics boring again, give business stability and certainty on what the trading environment will look like a year or two years from now and you will be pleasantly surprised.

If we keep encouraging or voting for chaos all you will get is more chaos.
It's a tough sell that BK but kudos for trying ;)
 
Yeah coz voting for Tories and Labour did so well until.we voted in....... oh right erm

Truly inspirational post btw

Business stability

We can only hope for such a wonderland

Pmsl.

We can indeed hope. Political stability is how a country thrives. Stability brings certainty and with certainty you can plan ahead. Chaos just feeds chaos. And since 2015 and the Cameron Govt it has been five prime ministers and nothing but instability and chaos. Some external and some we brought upon ourselves.

Been a fucking hoot hasn’t it?
 
So after two world wars we had higher debt? That's not particularly reassuring. Most people would accept that debt to finance fighting an existential threat to the nation is regrettable, but understandable.

This idea that government spending during peacetime, can and should be financed by debt is why we're in the situation we're in today. Big mistake giving politicians a blank cheque.

I don't agree that our debt levels are no big deal, in fact they are unsustainable, we are reaching the point where we are running out of buyers for our debt, which sends the rate higher, costing the government even more to service.

This is what's known as a debt doom loop, as the government borrows more, the bond markets require higher rates, which costs the government more, which means the government borrows more, etc, etc.

We've already reached the stage where servicing debt is a significant portion of government spending and this gets worse until we address this issue by cutting spending. If we don't do this voluntarily we're looking at a debt crisis eventually and then we're in for a world of pain.
Come on then, ideas what you're getting rid of? It's all very well making these statements but without tangible ideas it counts for nothing.
 
Come on then, ideas what you're getting rid of? It's all very well making these statements but without tangible ideas it counts for nothing.
Suffice to say we need to get serious about reducing spending in high spending government departments, not because we want to, but because we must. Don't blame me, blame the feckless politicians who've put us in this position.

The NHS funding model is out of date, the 5% spending target on defence is unaffordable, net zero needs to go, foreign aid needs to be reviewed, welfare spending is out of control, the government is too big and bloated, illegal immigration needs to be stopped. Just off the top of my head.

Going to be painful, but the longer we leave it the more painful it gets, a debt crisis will be much more painful
 
Africa has the highest birth rate at around 4. Europe, Asia, North and South America below 2 and Oceania at just above 2. The replacement rate is 2.1.

Births per woman have dropped from 5 to 2.25 since 1950 and Africa is slowly trending downwards in common with the rest of the world. The projection is world population to decline by the turn of the century.

The UK birth rate from 2023 data is 1.44 which is below the replacement rate. The maths seems pretty clear. If there is data to prove otherwise then I would be interested to read itAnnual population growth https://share.google/Jtf1mQOyNzUvNXVuy
Shows worldwide population currently growing by 70 million a year with projections to slow by end of century.

Annual population growth https://share.google/Jtf1mQOyNzUvNXVuy
1000050011.jpg
 
Forget talk of cutting back.

This Labour government will do what they all do and that is tax and spend.

Next lot will come in, blame this lot for the mess, blah blah blah, rinse and repeat.
 
Forget talk of cutting back.

This Labour government will do what they all do and that is tax and spend.

Next lot will come in, blame this lot for the mess, blah blah blah, rinse and repeat.
Not this time, the bond markets won't allow it.
 
Well, here's signs of stability.

Pmi index good


Business investment down but previous quarter was a high. But higher, just, than the last quarter before the election.


However, ask the bosses (e.g. the Institute of Directors) and they will say the outlook is poor. Now that couldn't be anything to do with not wanting to pay more tax, could it?
 
Suffice to say we need to get serious about reducing spending in high spending government departments, not because we want to, but because we must. Don't blame me, blame the feckless politicians who've put us in this position.

The NHS funding model is out of date, the 5% spending target on defence is unaffordable, net zero needs to go, foreign aid needs to be reviewed, welfare spending is out of control, the government is too big and bloated, illegal immigration needs to be stopped. Just off the top of my head.

Going to be painful, but the longer we leave it the more painful it gets, a debt crisis will be much more painful
Cut foreign aid, you get more migration.

Has anyone yet has made a link between the cuts in aid and increased migration? It was certainly predicted.
 
We can indeed hope. Political stability is how a country thrives. Stability brings certainty and with certainty you can plan ahead. Chaos just feeds chaos. And since 2015 and the Cameron Govt it has been five prime ministers and nothing but instability and chaos. Some external and some we brought upon ourselves.

Been a fucking hoot hasn’t it?

Really we don't know what tte economy or inflation will be doing in 3 weeks never mind 3 years :-), stability and certainty fucking hell.

Hey but whaddya gonna do

Again:-)
 
Yes. We’ve also had the financial crash in 2008, a major disruption to our industrial and foreign policy with Brexit followed by political instability in its wake, a global pandemic and a major war in Europe. Events have a major impact on our finances. Right now there is an unnecessary trade war, shifting of global supply lines and a US administration imposing a cost of living crisis on their own people via a sales tax and impacting our exports.

What the UK and the world needs is a period of calm stability. Instead we have people trying to burn everything down with zero clue on how to replace it. Make politics boring again, give business stability and certainty on what the trading environment will look like a year or two years from now and you will be pleasantly surprised.

If we keep encouraging or voting for chaos all you will get is more chaos.
Screenshot 2025-08-22 at 17.16.42.png
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top