BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 21,511
So after two world wars we had higher debt? That's not particularly reassuring. Most people would accept that debt to finance fighting an existential threat to the nation is regrettable, but understandable.
This idea that government spending during peacetime, can and should be financed by debt is why we're in the situation we're in today. Big mistake giving politicians a blank cheque.
I don't agree that our debt levels are no big deal, in fact they are unsustainable, we are reaching the point where we are running out of buyers for our debt, which sends the rate higher, costing the government even more to service.
This is what's known as a debt doom loop, as the government borrows more, the bond markets require higher rates, which costs the government more, which means the government borrows more, etc, etc.
We've already reached the stage where servicing debt is a significant portion of government spending and this gets worse until we address this issue by cutting spending. If we don't do this voluntarily we're looking at a debt crisis eventually and then we're in for a world of pain.
Yes. We’ve also had the financial crash in 2008, a major disruption to our industrial and foreign policy with Brexit followed by political instability in its wake, a global pandemic and a major war in Europe. Events have a major impact on our finances. Right now there is an unnecessary trade war, shifting of global supply lines and a US administration imposing a cost of living crisis on their own people via a sales tax and impacting our exports.
What the UK and the world needs is a period of calm stability. Instead we have people trying to burn everything down with zero clue on how to replace it. Make politics boring again, give business stability and certainty on what the trading environment will look like a year or two years from now and you will be pleasantly surprised.
If we keep encouraging or voting for chaos all you will get is more chaos.

