The Labour Government

bluejon said:
Good for you, you're awesome, but from what I've read, it's entirely possible she's made a mistake but everyone is so quick to jump specifically on her, primarily because parts of the media and twitter get everyone so wound up about her. They don't like northerners getting out their box you see.
Click to expand...
FFS
 
Hopefully there is a by election in Ashton so they can vote in an mp who actually lives in the area/ isn’t spending most of their time in the other side of the country
 
It is all getting very confusing. I have never voted Labour but I have to say; Jeremy Corbyn is the only person I can see right now that is being true to Labour and the values. It doesn't mean I would vote for Labour if Jeremy Corbyn was in charge (I didn't before); But respect where respect is due. The whole system is a sham and it degrades society increasingly when you see active banter in the house of commons day by day.
 
I am a little bit angry about her trying to substantiate through humanisation. How incredibly patronising can you be?
 
She has refered herself to tge parliamemetary ethics commitee, if found guilty she resigns.

no tory who has been caught out ever did and plenty the last 14 years robbed tax payer blind and openly.

She's fucked up, and live by the sword n. all that, bit takong up the front page new over an act of treason by the fisherprice mosley frog faced **** is tiresome and ridiculous, also the rent a mob who spray painted her house are orchastrated just like the rest.

She done wrong and should face the music, bit theor is an underlyign theme here of destabalisation in the way it is being reported conpared to similar previously that should concern us all
 
Gray said:
Very short honeymoon period for the Labour Party, they just do not understand what really pisses off the voters.
Click to expand...
They are poor are showing what they have done well and poorer at handing the rolling out unpopular policy.


letting reeves loose to cut the winter fuel as a first month policy gave those against them an in and since their good work is overshaddowed by negative press even though most of it is nonsnense
 
Going to be very interesting today.

I thought the way senior Labour politicians openly and unequivocally backed her yesterday was noteworthy and possibly telling. It’s safe to assume they likely know more than the rest of us about the minutiae.

Think they only way she can survive was if she was given negligent advice by an appropriate legal professional (who she was entitled to believe had some expertise in the relevant field) and that advice was founded on full and frank instructions from Rayner.

Anything less than that and I’d say her position is untenable I’m afraid. Which is a shame.
 
BossHog said:
Want to know how completely f*cked up the UK is?

The chancellor of the exchequer, the person in charge of the country's finances and taxation is DEFENDING tax avoidance because the person doing it is her mate

That's how rotten our government is.
Click to expand...


It's ok to avoid tax ... its illegal to evade tax. The question is which one did Rayner try and do?
 
bluejon said:
Good for you, you're awesome, but from what I've read, it's entirely possible she's made a mistake but everyone is so quick to jump specifically on her, primarily because parts of the media and twitter get everyone so wound up about her. They don't like northerners getting out their box you see.
Click to expand...
Nothing to do with that. If she hadn’t persistently called for at least ten other MPs to be sacked (before any inquiry was held- some trade union rep) I would not have cared less. She’s persistently said that if she broke any rules she resign. What’s she waiting for?
 
One Fan Clapping said:
Nothing to do with that. If she hadn’t persistently called for at least ten other MPs to be sacked (before any inquiry was held- some trade union rep) I would not have cared less. She’s persistently said that if she broke any rules she resign. What’s she waiting for?
Click to expand...
She's waiting to find out if she's broken any rules I guess?
 
Ifwecouldjust....... said:
It's ok to avoid tax ... its illegal to evade tax. The question is which one did Rayner try and do?
Click to expand...
Is avoidance OK when you've spent your whole career mercilessly slagging people off for doing what she's done?

I don't think it is at all.

Not to mention her very poor judgement at best.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Going to be very interesting today.

I thought the way senior Labour politicians openly and unequivocally backed her yesterday was noteworthy and possibly telling. It’s safe to assume they likely know more than the rest of us about the minutiae.

Think they only way she can survive was if she was given negligent advice by an appropriate legal professional (who she was entitled to believe had some expertise in the relevant field) and that advice was founded on full and frank instructions from Rayner.

Anything less than that and I’d say her position is untenable I’m afraid. Which is a shame.
Click to expand...

Add in that Starmer put a timeline on the conclusion of his appointed independent ethics advisor on top of the way she was backed yesterday, certainly interesting.
 
Interesting how Sky have just covered the Rayner issue. Straight down the middle, only facts and no conjecture. Not seen too much of this on Sky and looks like they’ve had word not to overplay it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top