That’s an irrelevance.
She told one story on Wednesday, that she was simply unaware of the requirement, and by yesterday afternoon the story changed to the complete opposite.
Given that the first story was conveyed in an official letter to the PM and his ethics advisor, do you not think Reeves should have ascertained the facts of the matter before making such a declaration?
Would a truly competent professional person in Reeves’ position be expected to make such an amateurish mistake, given the level of scrutiny placed on them? I think not.