Congratulations to Lisa Nandy on finishing her chances of ever becoming Prime Minister by saying she would vote to dissolve the monarchy (and constitution), although she would like a “Queen Meghan”.
Even RLB and Starmer backed keeping the monarchy.
Congratulations to Lisa Nandy on finishing her chances of ever becoming Prime Minister by saying she would vote to dissolve the monarchy (and constitution), although she would like a “Queen Meghan”.
Even RLB and Starmer backed keeping the monarchy.
Yep a real vote winner and an issue that is forefront of everyones minds in the UK.
The lot of them are utterly useless.
Teachers are leaving in record numbers because of how they're treated by the government.More than happy to leave this now I’ve answered it :-)
Just say it’s not important to your policy and move on, even Corbyn managed that.
Teachers are leaving in record numbers because of how they're treated by the government.
Johnson 1, May, Cameron and the coalition is the last few.Did you read anything I have written?
I’m talking about policy change in this area so I am in agreement with that. I wouldn’t blame this government though, they’ve been in power 2 months and this has been decades’ worth of change.
Essentially I’d blame the last few governments.
Its a loaded question and the fact she and others walk into them and blurt out an answer is what is laughable.
Who advises them? At what point do they become politically savvy?
Johnson 1, May, Cameron and the coalition is the last few.
One thing in common.
Not sure Blair should be on your list.Add to that Brown, Blair, Major.
Not reckless with the economy?Johnson 1, May, Cameron and the coalition is the last few.
One thing in common.
Not sure Blair should be on your list.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6564933.stm
On the other hand the last year hasn't been particularly great.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-44648438
Johnson 1, May, Cameron and the coalition is the last few.
One thing in common.
Apart from wanting to beat children, you said teachers you know felt they had problems controlling classes. Perhaps that's because under the Tories class sizes have risen and there are fewer teaching assistants.Did you read anything I have written?
I’m talking about policy change in this area so I am in agreement with that. I wouldn’t blame this government though, they’ve been in power 2 months and this has been decades’ worth of change.
Essentially I’d blame the last few governments.
Apart from wanting to beat children, you said teachers you know felt they had problems controlling classes. Perhaps that's because under the Tories class sizes have risen and there are fewer teaching assistants.
Unruly classes barely features in why teachers are leaving the profession.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...ers-plan-to-leave-profession-within-two-years
As you hadn't even started school was Blair reduced class sizes and increased school budgets you have no idea what a difference it made. I was on several school governing bodies. I know.
I've no idea what "accelerated approach" means but if you think pressure on teachers is not worse now than under Labour I can't help you.Vic stop lowering yourself to your usual depths for once please. I don’t want to beat children, I never have hit a child and I hopefully never will. What I want is the teachers to have the ability to enact a mildly form of punishment that used to exist in decades gone by. I’ve said I don’t wish to return to the 70s, with teachers having a mostly free reign to batter kids.
Class sizes under the Tories is one of the main contributing factors. I’ve no idea why you think I’m only attacking Labour on this and not the Tories, I’m just as critical of both.
I had started school. I started school before Blair was PM in 1996, thank you.
Again, I wish you’d actually read what I wrote. My criticism of Blair is about his accelerated approach to the comprehensive experiment and the further illegality of selecting on ability in areas, it’s nothing to do with his class sizes or funding. We all know Blair spent.
Overtime without being properly paid is a main reason too but to pretend controlling the classroom isn’t a factor is naive and ignorant. My mother in law has been a teacher for decades, I have 4 (1 former now) teachers in my immediate group of friends, one of which is a Deputy Head.
They’re all saying it’s not worth it and as I say the bubble will soon burst unless there’s vast investment and controls into education.
I've no idea what "accelerated approach" means but if you think pressure on teachers is not worse now than under Labour I can't help you.
And I'm not sure I really want to know what your concept is of a mild beating.
I've no idea what "accelerated approach" means but if you think pressure on teachers is not worse now than under Labour I can't help you.
And I'm not sure I really want to know what your concept is of a mild beating.
Because frankly I doubt that many people understand what "approach accelerated" means.It means his approach accelerated equalitarianism policy, how is that hard to understand?