I think I shall email MRLP HQ and get the lowdown on their candidate. The only thing that's come through the door beside the polling cards is some guff from just the one candidate. Who pays for all the leafletting in an election. Is it the taxpayer or do the political parties have to cough up - which will explain how the other candidates are skint!Considering the electorate there's every chance an anti-Semite has a chance to win the seat.
Suella says hiOnly after a couple of days of squirming, next-level mental gymnastics, ludicrous suggestions of remorse and simply hoping it would all go away.
Poor judgement and a lack of backbone.
Wouldn't be like the Daily Heil to do such a thing to attack Tory opposition...So the Daily Mail waited till after nominations closed before publishing ...
Only after a couple of days of squirming, next-level mental gymnastics, ludicrous suggestions of remorse and simply hoping it would all go away.
Poor judgement and a lack of backbone.
Not much point shifting blame onto the Daily Heil when the comments were made at a Labour party function, and either agreed with, ignored, or not acted upon in the first place !Wouldn't be like the Daily Heil to do such a thing to attack Tory opposition...
I would have thought it was a prerequisite of a candidate in such a area to appease a large part of the electorate.Considering the electorate there's every chance an anti-Semite has a chance to win the seat.
Not much point shifting blame onto the Daily Heil when the comments were made at a Labour party function, and either agreed with, ignored, or not acted upon in the first place !
Nah, I’m afraid trotting that out isn’t going to change the picture.Sometimes it can take time for parties to react. Keeping sex pests in roles is another really tough decision for any party to make, or maybe breaking lockdown rules and partying whilst people had funerals with no one in attendance.
It’s all relative.
Considering the electorate there's every chance an anti-Semite has a chance to win the seat.
You think he handled it well then?A whole 48 hours and then acted?
Shocking. Everyone knows the correct response is to make the offending candidate a life peer.
LolNah, I’m afraid trotting that out isn’t going to change the picture.
Starmer has shown exceptionally poor judgement and a complete lack of backbone. All because he wants to keep his racist votes.
You can kid yourself about it if you want, but don’t expect anybody else to believe it.
Slight change for accuracy.Galloway is an illustration that Tories don't have a monopoly on cunts.
Bit harsh calling the majority white population of Rochdale anti-semites.
Wht's your viewon Sunak and Braverman, considering what she did ?Nah, I’m afraid trotting that out isn’t going to change the picture.
Starmer has shown exceptionally poor judgement and a complete lack of backbone. All because he wants to keep his racist votes.
You can kid yourself about it if you want, but don’t expect anybody else to believe it.
Nah, I’m afraid trotting that out isn’t going to change the picture.
Starmer has shown exceptionally poor judgement and a complete lack of backbone. All because he wants to keep his racist votes.
You can kid yourself about it if you want, but don’t expect anybody else to believe it.
Wht's your viewon Sunak and Braverman, considering what she did
Wasn't shifting the blame.Not much point shifting blame onto the Daily Heil when the comments were made at a Labour party function, and either agreed with, ignored, or not acted upon in the first place !
He/She is calling out Starmer for being weak. If Starmer is weak, wtf does that make Sunak?Haven't those two scoundrels been hung drawn and quartered on their own very long and angry thread already?