I voted Lib Dem in 05 and 10 as I liked their policies, and it became clear that the debt being built up by Brown, relative to other countries, was setting us up for a fall that duely arrivedBy that record you haven't voted Labour for 5 consecutive elections.
What were the reasons you didn't vote for Blair in 05, Brown in 10 and Milband in 15?
Yes I warned up the tine machine1897? That's impressive.
Going from the content in this post, can we assume you didn't vote for the Tories in the last election?
It's just some of your past posts come across (to me anyway) as 'pro Boris' and for someone who states they don't vote for anyone who is purposefully racist, voting for Boris and the Tory party would be somewhat hypocritical.
Their is institutional racism and purposeful racism. Corbyn and far too many of the Left wing loons have crossed the line.So you don't vote at all anymore then i take it.
The Tories are racist, Labour are racist, Brexit lot are racist, even the cuddly Lib Dems and the Greens will have racists in the party too.
I would love to hear what all these people who say the UK isn't institutionally racist have to say about that. Maybe the UK is institutionally racist despite what all the white nationalists say.
Explain that to me in depth so that my revolutionary zeal can be lifted from my eyes.Their is institutional racism and purposeful racism. Corbyn and far too many of the Left wing loons have crossed the line.
You're revolutionary zeal makes you blind, so you can't see it.
Just on the membership vote, that includes people who joined as full members in order to vote in the election (as well as registered supporters and union affiliates). LSE did research and reckoned most who were Labour members before the leadership election were not Corbyn supporters.Labour leadership contest: The truth about £3 party supporters and Jeremy Corbyn
He also won even more comfortably in 2016 after the supporters fee was raised and he had to make a legal challenge to get on the ballot.
Labour leadership election: members' vote breakdown
He had a strong and legitimate mandate. Unfortunately the right-wing element of the party joined hand-in-hand with the right-wing and Liberal press in smearing him. He was also unsuitable on a personal level as a leader and was too indecisive, proud and stubborn for his own good and ultimately contributed to his own downfall. Issues such as ethical foreign policy, Equivocation over NATO and focus on Israel - Palestine were a distraction and a waste of time and effort.
Domestic economic issues and narrative were far more important and were neglected or undermined by Corbyn. If only Mcdonell had not made poor decisions in the past and poisened his own personal profile, I get the impression he would have coped with the responsibility of the office much more competently. Obviously Brexit played a huge role and it was probably always going to end in defeat after the result of the referendum.
Now Starmer has a clear mandate. Hopefully he can move beyond these issues after implementing the report and abide by the spirit in terms of avoiding political interference in disciplinary matters in the future. Builds on his pledges and establishes a clear narrative and a transformative package of policies that will change our society and economy for the better. Soft-left is alright by me, as long as you have the desire and belief that you can change society for the better. But the third-way politics of the past must stay there.
Ridiculous. The 1997 pledges on reducing class size and on funding gave us the biggest school improvement since 1944.The schools are decent.
It’s the Labour Party and their tools (could be the other way round) in the two major unions opposing improvements.
Neither is acceptable but the National Socialist esc zeal of Corbyn etc is totally unacceptable as it is pure poison and only has one destination.Explain that to me in depth so that my revolutionary zeal can be lifted from my eyes.
Is purposeful racism acceptable then and institutional racism unacceptable?
WOW!Neither is acceptable but the National Socialist esc zeal of Corbyn etc is totally unacceptable as it is pure poison and only has one destination.
I'm afraid you won't see the truth of it so there really is no point in arguing.
Enjoy your day.
Cobblers about Brown and debt (in 2005?).I voted Lib Dem in 05 and 10 as I liked their policies, and it became clear that the debt being built up by Brown, relative to other countries, was setting us up for a fall that duely arrived
I voted Tory with a heavy heart in 15, 17 and 19 as Labour had set off to the political wilderness to become unelectable and the Lib Dems decided they really were fruit loops.
Does that count as a Godwin's Law example?Neither is acceptable but the National Socialist esc zeal of Corbyn etc is totally unacceptable as it is pure poison and only has one destination.
I'm afraid you won't see the truth of it so there really is no point in arguing.
Enjoy your day.