It was aimed at superblue91 and Pigeonho who think it's been ungrateful to our owners to question a signing because quite clearly I don't know I'm born. I've been hugely positive about our owners, but it shouldn't translate to not questioning anything the club now does, including signings. I am pretty sick of people who want Rooney signed trying to act like truer fans simply because you want Rooney signed. I do not hold the opposite opinion - that those who want him signed are lesser fans. With me, it's about the football. I'm not convinced Tevez and Rooney are a good partnership, having played together at the rags for two seasons, scoring an average of 21.5 league goals combined a season - less than either of them individually last season. Bearing that in mind, I'd expect another signing like Dzeko, a player a bit more removed from the Tevez mould, to be more effective. I'll set out my criteria by which I will judge this signing to be a success. Less than 37 goals; failure. More than 45; success. 37-45; no-man's land and could have been easily achieved by other means. So, come and judge me about it in May 2012. As for the marketing and profile reasons for signing him, I'll trust our club to do their sums on that. Does Rooney bring more money in that he costs in wages, signing on bonus and/or transfer fees? If he does, fair enough, the club should do what's in its financial best interests and stick their fingers up at the football argument.