The Post General Election Thread

[Rascal]

meths.

Stop it. I want 2 weeks in Mexico this year.. Work harder you workshy fucker.

Can I reply as I'm a tax exile and therefore don't contribute to you at all.

You can contribute direct my friend

Just send me your bank details ;))

 

[squirtyflower]

meths.

Stop it. I want 2 weeks in Mexico this year.. Work harder you workshy fucker.

Can I reply as I'm a tax exile and therefore don't contribute to you at all.

Tax exiles should be banned from Bluemoon

 

[squirtyflower]

Stop it. I want 2 weeks in Mexico this year.. Work harder you workshy fucker.

Can I reply as I'm a tax exile and therefore don't contribute to you at all.

You can contribute direct my friend

Just send me your bank details ;))

Aryou a Nigrian princ by any chance?

 

[aguero93:20]

Can I reply as I'm a tax exile and therefore don't contribute to you at all.

You can contribute direct my friend

Just send me your bank details ;))

Aryou a Nigrian princ by any chance?

Have you been drinking?

 

[Rascal]

Can I reply as I'm a tax exile and therefore don't contribute to you at all.

You can contribute direct my friend

Just send me your bank details ;))

Aryou a Nigrian princ by any chance?

Shush!!!

Dont want any of these tories thinking i have a job on the sly ;)

 

[kas_tippler]

Has anybody come up with a plausible theory of the mass exodus of Labour voters who defected to UKIP in the general election? Couldn't be that deep down they are racist?

You really are a WUM

Valid question.

 

[SWP's back]

You can contribute direct my friend

Just send me your bank details ;))

Aryou a Nigrian princ by any chance?

Have you been drinking?

Big whoooooosh

 

[whp.blue]

Okay I will have to explain then, the government in its wisdom decided that they would change the system for those receiving disability allowance, they are under the impression that some who receive the benefit are capable of work, rascal quoted 20 percent, let's say this is true, he then claims that as only 0.5 percent are fraudulent claimants it doesn't add up

IDS wants to cut disability benefits by 20% to save money. that only 0.5% of claims according to his own facts and figures supplied by his Dept the DWP just show what an idiotic c**t the man is. He knows that 20% are not fraudulent but he wants to save 20% nonetheless.

Over the last 8 years or so since the ATOS tests started i must have made a 1000 posts on this subject. Its a subject that affects me and many people i know and its a subject i have researched. I know campaigners who have produced reports, lobbied parliament and demonstrated against these cuts. Because that is what they are. They are cuts in the availability of welfare to 1 in 5 disabled people based on a scurrilous and discredited test that is undertaken by unqualified personal aiming to meet targets set underhandly by IDS and his right hand woman Mcvey and before her Millar and Grayling.

I repeatedly warned where these tests would lead and i have been proved right at every turn. People here may laugh at some of my politics and i laugh at myself at some of the nonsense im capable of producing but on this issue and on this issue alone i am always deadly serious as i have seen at first hand what damage these cuts are doing to people and what hharm they are inflicting on some of the most vulnerable in society.

Rascal I get all this and as my previous posts have stated they have fucked up but fraud is only one reason why this has been brought in so the figure is irrelevant, the debate is about how many rightfully currently claiming the benefit and are able to work and how do we fairly judge this, by throwing the unprovable fraud figure about you are sending the debate in the wrong direction
Although I don't generally agree with forced employment on employers I believe the government should make large companies employ by law a certain percent of mentally or physically disabled workers

How can they the government don't even do this so why should any Private company employ a person who may not be capable of fully doing the work. and are the government going to pay for the necessary modifications to buildings etc. or do you expect companies to be forced to pay these costs as well?
I know I wouldn't employ anyone who could do the Job fully and it is unfair on other workers if they have to do the duties some could not do and especially if they are both paid the same.

 

[The perfect fumble]

IDS wants to cut disability benefits by 20% to save money. that only 0.5% of claims according to his own facts and figures supplied by his Dept the DWP just show what an idiotic c**t the man is. He knows that 20% are not fraudulent but he wants to save 20% nonetheless.

Over the last 8 years or so since the ATOS tests started i must have made a 1000 posts on this subject. Its a subject that affects me and many people i know and its a subject i have researched. I know campaigners who have produced reports, lobbied parliament and demonstrated against these cuts. Because that is what they are. They are cuts in the availability of welfare to 1 in 5 disabled people based on a scurrilous and discredited test that is undertaken by unqualified personal aiming to meet targets set underhandly by IDS and his right hand woman Mcvey and before her Millar and Grayling.

I repeatedly warned where these tests would lead and i have been proved right at every turn. People here may laugh at some of my politics and i laugh at myself at some of the nonsense im capable of producing but on this issue and on this issue alone i am always deadly serious as i have seen at first hand what damage these cuts are doing to people and what hharm they are inflicting on some of the most vulnerable in society.

Rascal I get all this and as my previous posts have stated they have fucked up but fraud is only one reason why this has been brought in so the figure is irrelevant, the debate is about how many rightfully currently claiming the benefit and are able to work and how do we fairly judge this, by throwing the unprovable fraud figure about you are sending the debate in the wrong direction
Although I don't generally agree with forced employment on employers I believe the government should make large companies employ by law a certain percent of mentally or physically disabled workers

How can they the government don't even do this so why should any Private company employ a person who may not be capable of fully doing the work. and are the government going to pay for the necessary modifications to buildings etc. or do you expect companies to be forced to pay these costs as well?
I know I wouldn't employ anyone who could do the Job fully and it is unfair on other workers if they have to do the duties some could not do and especially if they are both paid the same.

So I'm sure you wept when the Remploy factories were closed, and I'm equally sure you're scathing in your criticism of the government reclassifying these people as fit for work, that you see it as nothing more than a punitive and a shabby cuts exercise, because, as you say, declaring these people fit for work is utterly meaningless, because people like you would never employ them anyway.

 

[The perfect fumble]

UKIP, or, as we must now refer to it " Nigel Farage, c**t" imploding before our eyes.

3.8 million votes for a new type of politics?

Edited.

Seems the BBC agrees....

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt_qCVlYV94&feature=youtu.be[/video]