without a dream
Well-Known Member
Shands said:Rascal said:Shands said:Choo choo, all aboard the sky train!
It is impressive how they do it, time after time.
Watched Tirreno Adriatco today and they were at the front virtually the whole coverage. It was a superb finish to the race.
Great win for Porte at Paris-Nice, he comes across as a really decent fella, especially as i have always found aussie sportsmen to be arrogant fuckers lol.
It’s certainly impressive, but it’s not a style of racing I’m enamoured with to be honest. I’ve read that Nibali has suggested on Twitter there should be a ban on power meters and I’m inclined to agree with him. Riding tempo up a mountain may well be a legitimate approach, but ultimately its tactical raison d’être is the stifling of individual attacks, and that’s not something I want to see. I think this adherence to how many power watts they’re pushing is too clinical for my own liking. It doesn’t help that the last teams to display this dominant team approach were US Postal (Armstrong) and T.Mobile (Ulrich), and given how they both turned out SKY’s modus operandi is bound to stir up negative connotations.
I have to say the last couple of days have thrown up some questions for me over Team Sky, not so much with regard to ‘are they cheating?’ but more ‘how are they managing to achieve what they are?’. When I see guys like Lopez, Cutaldo and Pate, who have been average domestiques on other teams, suddenly setting a pace capable of distancing top climbers/GC contenders, it makes me scratch my head. Then you have guys like Porte and Froome who just two or three years ago were losing many minutes zigzagging on climbs, now flying up mountains faster than habitual dopers and TT’ing as fast or faster than the best in the business. Add in the drop off in performance from guys like Rodgers since leaving SKY and it all becomes puzzling. Given the vocal public stance made by the team management I find it very hard to believe that they are doping (certainly not systematically anyway), but their competitors aren’t exactly a bunch of amateurs fumbling in the dark, so what is it on the sports science side that SKY are doing to make themselves so strong?
Having said all that when the SKY train does get put under pressure, like Kreuziger and Purito managed yesterday, it does make for exciting viewing!
JOGAMIGMOG said:Any highlights on ITV4 on any cycling event this year does anyone know? Obviously the TdF will be on and (possibly) the Giro again, but what about any others? I reckon Froomy's got the TdF in the bag already.
Despite what I’ve just written there^ I don’t think Froome will be infallible for le Tour. He does look extremely strong and composed in these one week races, and in all likely hood he will be turning up in France with the strongest supporting cast of any on the GC contenders, but I still think there’s the possibility of him cracking over three weeks if the race is ridden hard (a la last year’s Vuelta). I think a lot could depend on Andy Schleck actually. It doesn’t seem likely right now, but if he is able to get himself back in his top shape (both physically and mentally) by July, I think Froome will have a fight on to control both he and Contador. Time will tell.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/21331484" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/21331484</a>
Was quite interesting and goes some way to explaining their success.