The Rapture (Return of Christ) & Doomsday Predicted

gaudinho's stolen car said:
gaz76 said:
Fuck me it's happenin repent REPENT!!!!! Atrgggghhhhh

-- Sat May 21, 2011 9:07 am --

gaz76 said:
Fuck me it's happenin repent REPENT!!!!! Atrgggghhhhh

Ooops sorry false alarm, was just the postman,

Fucking postman just knocked on and woke me up. Wish it was the end of the world.


Check he hasn't scrawled any nasty rag propaganda on your mail,mate - they do that,so I hear.
But then the Bluemoon packdogs hunt 'em down,get 'em dismissed,burn down their houses,then dig up all their dead relatives and mutilate the corpses.
You can bet that if the world does end tomorrow,they will still be playing injury time at the swamp if the scum aren't winning.
 
im in work at 5 tonight....should i fuck it off and spend my last few hours on this piss?
 
Matty said:
The bible clearly says, no-one but God the Father knows when Jesus will come back, so he's clearly wrong...

The bible was written by some blokes a few thousand years ago, so using quotations from the bible to prove/disprove anything is a fruitless task. It's not fact, it's storytelling, elaborate storytelling I'll grant you, but make believe nonetheless.

482.jpg


It seems that when it comes to religion, common sense flies out the window on all sides of the argument.

1. The bible was written by human beings over several centuries and is a combination of factual, historical, poetic, biographical, allegorical, prophetic and knowledge based accounts etc. It contains almost no pure scientific or literal accounts.

2. Creationist bible bashing preachers like this man give mature Christianity a bad name.

Anyone who attempts to quantify the date of Jesus' return is laughable beyond the most fundamentalist atheist.<br /><br />-- Sat May 21, 2011 3:51 pm --<br /><br />
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
gaudinho's stolen car said:
gaz76 said:
Fuck me it's happenin repent REPENT!!!!! Atrgggghhhhh

-- Sat May 21, 2011 9:07 am --



Ooops sorry false alarm, was just the postman,

Fucking postman just knocked on and woke me up. Wish it was the end of the world.


Check he hasn't scrawled any nasty rag propaganda on your mail,mate - they do that,so I hear.
But then the Bluemoon packdogs hunt 'em down,get 'em dismissed,burn down their houses,then dig up all their dead relatives and mutilate the corpses.
You can bet that if the world does end tomorrow,they will still be playing injury time at the swamp if the scum aren't winning.

Hahahahaha

Nice one Nijininsky

Hahahahahahaha

Hahahahahahaha
 
pauldominic said:
Matty said:
The bible clearly says, no-one but God the Father knows when Jesus will come back, so he's clearly wrong...

The bible was written by some blokes a few thousand years ago, so using quotations from the bible to prove/disprove anything is a fruitless task. It's not fact, it's storytelling, elaborate storytelling I'll grant you, but make believe nonetheless.

482.jpg


It seems that when it comes to religion, common sense flies out the window on all sides of the argument.

1. The bible was written by human beings over several centuries and is a combination of factual, historical, poetic, biographical, allegorical, prophetic and knowledge based accounts etc. It contains almost no pure scientific or literal accounts.

No, it is story telling. It was written after all the protagonists died and with no proof of any of its claims. As you have been told, each century, science proves another facet of the bible as inaccurate and god sqau simply add that part to "allegorical".

Whilst I laugh at creationists, atleast they stick to their guns and don't move the goal posts whilst desperately hanging on to the hope that "this isn't all there is".
 
SWP's back said:
pauldominic said:
Matty said:
The bible was written by some blokes a few thousand years ago, so using quotations from the bible to prove/disprove anything is a fruitless task. It's not fact, it's storytelling, elaborate storytelling I'll grant you, but make believe nonetheless.

482.jpg


It seems that when it comes to religion, common sense flies out the window on all sides of the argument.

1. The bible was written by human beings over several centuries and is a combination of factual, historical, poetic, biographical, allegorical, prophetic and knowledge based accounts etc. It contains almost no pure scientific or literal accounts.

No, it is story telling. It was written after all the protagonists died and with no proof of any of its claims. As you have been told, each century, science proves another facet of the bible as inaccurate and god sqau simply add that part to "allegorical".

Whilst I laugh at creationists, atleast they stick to their guns and don't move the goal posts whilst desperately hanging on to the hope that "this isn't all there is".

Oh excellent. Pantomime time again.

Oh no its not.

Tell me which part of the bible is proven to be inaccurate by science.

Evidence is insufficient. Proof is required.

I'd go back to Dawkins and reference his books if I were you.

Its utter bollocks to suggest that serious Christians believe that God literally created the universe in 6 days.
 
Damocles said:
There's a bit of a loophole here.

If the rapture is a certainty and only God knows when it will happen, this means that God has the knowledge of all human future.

Therefore, free will is just an illusion, as the end of all life has already been decided and is unchangeable no matter what we do.


Bingo! Welcome to the Defeatist movement!
 
pauldominic said:
Tell me which part of the bible is proven to be inaccurate by science.

Evidence is insufficient. Proof is required.

I'd go back to Dawkins and reference his books if I were you.

Its utter bollocks to suggest that serious Christians believe that God literally created the universe in 6 days.

Genesis, just for a start.
 
pauldominic said:
SWP's back said:
pauldominic said:
482.jpg


It seems that when it comes to religion, common sense flies out the window on all sides of the argument.

1. The bible was written by human beings over several centuries and is a combination of factual, historical, poetic, biographical, allegorical, prophetic and knowledge based accounts etc. It contains almost no pure scientific or literal accounts.

No, it is story telling. It was written after all the protagonists died and with no proof of any of its claims. As you have been told, each century, science proves another facet of the bible as inaccurate and god sqau simply add that part to "allegorical".

Whilst I laugh at creationists, atleast they stick to their guns and don't move the goal posts whilst desperately hanging on to the hope that "this isn't all there is".

Oh excellent. Pantomime time again.

Oh no its not.

Tell me which part of the bible is proven to be inaccurate by science.

Evidence is insufficient. Proof is required.

I'd go back to Dawkins and reference his books if I were you.

Its utter bollocks to suggest that serious Christians believe that God literally created the universe in 6 days.

Thank the Lord ;-) someone has written this, I've been saying this every time one of the religion threads turns up.
 
pauldominic said:
SWP's back said:
pauldominic said:
482.jpg


It seems that when it comes to religion, common sense flies out the window on all sides of the argument.

1. The bible was written by human beings over several centuries and is a combination of factual, historical, poetic, biographical, allegorical, prophetic and knowledge based accounts etc. It contains almost no pure scientific or literal accounts.

No, it is story telling. It was written after all the protagonists died and with no proof of any of its claims. As you have been told, each century, science proves another facet of the bible as inaccurate and god sqau simply add that part to "allegorical".

Whilst I laugh at creationists, atleast they stick to their guns and don't move the goal posts whilst desperately hanging on to the hope that "this isn't all there is".

Oh excellent. Pantomime time again.

Oh no its not.

Tell me which part of the bible is proven to be inaccurate by science.

Evidence is insufficient. Proof is required.

I'd go back to Dawkins and reference his books if I were you.

Its utter bollocks to suggest that serious Christians believe that God literally created the universe in 6 days.

you really have a hang up with dawkins, mister
you have to let this obsession go
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.