cleavers said:Ok thanks very much "sweet cheeks", obviously the media always know the full story, especially sweet daniel. What was I thinking to disbelieve such a reliable source, he's such a great investigative journalist.BobKowalski said:cleavers said:Daniel Taylor was at the meeting before training so knows what was said, OK.
Sorry but its made up to suit the eventual outcome, and its unlikely it will be denied on either side.
Ah you mean it doesn't suit your narrative so hence its bollocks
Daniel Taylor on the 12th January:
"There is a good reason why over the coming days and weeks you may hear Roberto Mancini maintaining the public line that Manchester City don't want to sell Mario Balotelli and will happily stick by him no matter how many times he brings the club and himself into disrepute.
The truth is something different. It is just that Mancini is schooled in football politics and understands very well that the first rule of selling is to have a strategy. Admitting that Balotelli is for sale would drive down his price. So a different version is offered for the cameras when, privately, City are already down to the nitty-gritty of talking about how much money they can get and who may possibly want him....."
You can read the rest on the Guardian site if you wish but you get the drift.
Over to you sweet cheeks
In the real world jounalists hear stuff/make shit up, and for this reason I don't buy newspapers ever, and everything I read on their websites, I assume to be about as true as all McDonald's burgers contain 100% beef.
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer said:Can see where you're coming from but it has only made his position stronger IMO- the deal has been in the pipeline for 2 months mate, mario was being dressed down in front of the others on a regular basis, and rightly so, while this obviously made the mario/Mancini relationship die somewhat, it has ultimately earned bob huge respect from within!
Just because you don't think it relevant doesn't make you right, thankfully, plenty of others have contributed, so I can't say I'm particularly arsed what you think, but thanks for letting me know.BobKowalski said:And no this thread doesn't qualify as relevant question for debate on a forum. Chimpanzees picking each others arses have come up with more relevant questions for debate than this.
Just wow, he's been the manager that got us our first top division title since 1968, first FA Cup win since 1969, he's 2 major trophies away from equalling our best ever manager totals in only 2 and 1/2 seasons in charge.smeeagain said:if i could add my 2 penneth
its not often a player is bought ,then sold by the same manager,
i maintain we won the 2 trophies despite bobby blunder ,not because of him !
-- Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:22 pm --
if i could add my 2 penneth
its not often a player is bought ,then sold by the same manager,
i maintain we won the 2 trophies despite bobby blunder ,not because of him !
smeeagain said:if i could add my 2 penneth
its not often a player is bought ,then sold by the same manager,
i maintain we won the 2 trophies despite bobby blunder ,not because of him !
-- Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:22 pm --
if i could add my 2 penneth
its not often a player is bought ,then sold by the same manager,
i maintain we won the 2 trophies despite bobby blunder ,not because of him !