The Rise of the Far Right

50 pages had this been someone saying humbug.

Threats to life and 2 hung effigies are seemingly not worthy of comment though from the usual suspects?

Hypocrites to a man!

Or, it’s a Sunday afternoon and people have better things to do?

Also, does it really need comment? No one in their right mind would defend. But putting that to one side, your point doesn’t really stand as the PM was answering a direct question in the House of Commons and should surely be held to a higher standard than the as yet known culprits of the bridge message/threat?
 
50 pages had this been someone saying humbug.

Threats to life and 2 hung effigies are seemingly not worthy of comment though from the usual suspects?

Hypocrites to a man!

It’ll be the same cunts that hang up banners like this-

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/...isemitism-jlm-members-sick-unwelcome-1.489045

Threatening life against anyone because of their political beliefs is wrong and it was wrong last year when they had “hang the Tories” with effigies going over the same bridge.

Politics is incredibly volatile and polarised at the moment, the difference is though and this needs to be pointed out, Johnson is whipping up the hatred on one side with his rhetoric.
 
The Traditionalist Workers Party that organised the Unite the Right rally in Charlottsville where one person died and many were injured is no more. It imploded in rather spectacular style.

https://percolately.com/lindsey/neo-nazi-group-love-triangle-fistfight-in-trailer-park/

Apparently, the married Heimbach was involved in a not-so-secret affair with former TWP spokesman David Parrott’s wife — who also happened to be Heimbach’s mother-in-law, more or less.

trump-make-america-great-again-my-incesters-built-this-country-43799977.png
 
I guess the point I'm making is that quite clearly with one of those symbols, it isn't. Arguably should be, but isn't.
And you are making a perfectly obvious and indisputable point in a calm and considered manner.

There is something inconsistent and indeed a bit sinister in how these symbols are viewed sooooo differently

That is the issue with good points - they are inconvenient truths and people need to run and hide

Edit - only realised afterwards that this is an 'old' thread - been proper funny
 
Last edited:
Talking to you is often like talking to one of those Best Man Speech generators.
Fuck - that is a good line - I need to borrow that

Perhaps other have heard it before - but I have not.

Just come across this thread and only just realised that it is a couple of months old.

Really quite funny reading these exchanges from months ago in 'one sitting' - some people really do 'stand out'
 
For Nazism genocide was a design feature rather than a bug. I am not aware (I could be wrong) of the Soviet Union setting up death camps for the express purpose of genocide. Neither regime is winning humanitarian of the years awards but there is a crucial difference.
No genocide in Russia? Give over. Political groups rather than races or the disabled but genocide it is nontheless.
https://www.hoover.org/research/stalins-genocides
 
The moment Toby Young realises when he opens his mouth and speaks its not the same as the voices in his head......proper backed himself into a corner here ha ha ha

 
The moment Toby Young realises when he opens his mouth and speaks its not the same as the voices in his head......proper backed himself into a corner here ha ha ha



A) I don’t think he said anything wrong here nor was it a bad interview. He’s merely saying that his support of people’s freedom of speech has a line and they have values. His group wouldn’t protect or offer advice to someone who incited violence against a minority group, for example.

B) Why’s this in a far-right thread?
 
A) I don’t think he said anything wrong here nor was it a bad interview. He’s merely saying that his support of people’s freedom of speech has a line and they have values. His group wouldn’t protect or offer advice to someone who incited violence against a minority group, for example.

B) Why’s this in a far-right thread?

You are aware of the person about whom he speaks?
 
Last edited:
what the fuck is it with these right wing wankers that they cannot get their heads around a court order banning reporting?

James O'Brien Retweeted




Lizzie Dearden
@lizziedearden

·
5h

Tommy Robinson supporter and far-right organiser Daniel Thomas, known as Danny Tommo, has been charged with identifying a child who was entitled to lifetime anonymity under the Sexual Offences Act He is due to attend Kidderminster Magistrates’ Court on 24 March
 
You are aware of the person about whom he speaks?

Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon?

Of course I know who that **** is.

The point is about respecting those you disagree with’s right to speak.

I always remember Christopher Hitchens supporting the rights of a Holocaust denier, to say what he wanted to.

I think Aaron Bastani, George Galloway, Yaxley-Lennon, Paul Golding etc. are all nutters but I don’t want any of them cancelled. Their right to speak is the same as mine.

“Defend your enemies right to speak or give it up for yourself” - that was C. Hitchens.
 
Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon?

Of course I know who that **** is.

The point is about respecting those you disagree with’s right to speak.

I always remember Christopher Hitchens supporting the rights of a Holocaust denier, to say what he wanted to.

I think Aaron Bastani, George Galloway, Yaxley-Lennon, Paul Golding etc. are all nutters but I don’t want any of them cancelled. Their right to speak is the same as mine.

“Defend your enemies right to speak or give it up for yourself” - that was C. Hitchens.


You know you will now be considered a fully paid up member of the Blue Moon secret xenophobe society?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top