Indeed, it'd be nice if they fucked off and took their fight into outer space. It'd also be far more entertaining than the hugely overrated Gravity.aguero93:20 said:It's a pity we're directly between Russia and the U.S. isn't it, it's like being in a bar with two big fuckers you despise who're about to get in a row, you'd love to see them do damage to each other but don't want your pint to get spilled or the football to get interrupted.
Haven't seen it, lucky from what I've heard. It would be lovely if they did, if I had the means to get them there I'd fucking give it to them.Skashion said:Indeed, it'd be nice if they fucked off and took their fight into outer space. It'd also be far more entertaining than the hugely overrated Gravity.aguero93:20 said:It's a pity we're directly between Russia and the U.S. isn't it, it's like being in a bar with two big fuckers you despise who're about to get in a row, you'd love to see them do damage to each other but don't want your pint to get spilled or the football to get interrupted.
Ducado said:buzzer1 said:Ducado said:All we need now is a couple of verses of the Horst-Wessel-Lied and this thread will be complete
Die fahne hoch...
Haha i was awaiting your arrival ol' bean... and with that, i'm out;)
I have no problem with people drawing comparisons Buzzer, I did ask earlier in the thread if it was ever OK to annex or occupy a country, the silence was deafening, it seems that it's perfectly OK to do so as long as the the country doing the annexing are not Jewish or a member of NATO
Which poster said that was ok?west didsblue said:For some people it seems to be OK if the occupiers ethnically cleansed all of the indigenous population like Stalin did with the Tatars in 1944.
On the other hand if the UN votes for the formation of a state and it's neighbours immediately try to obliterate it and lose, it's not OK for that state to exist.
You seem to be quite happy with the Russians annexing Crimea in spite of the fact that they evicted the indigenous population in the 1940s.Skashion said:Which poster said that was ok?west didsblue said:For some people it seems to be OK if the occupiers ethnically cleansed all of the indigenous population like Stalin did with the Tatars in 1944.
On the other hand if the UN votes for the formation of a state and it's neighbours immediately try to obliterate it and lose, it's not OK for that state to exist.
Which poster said Israel shouldn't exist?
Just because I think the democratic wishes of the majority have been rightly acquiesced to in 2014 the does not in any way, shape or form justify the victims of the second most deplorable man in history in the 1940s. There is no logical connection at all there. It wouldn't justify now either. If ethnic cleansing does occur I will utterly condemn it.west didsblue said:You seem to be quite happy with the Russians annexing Crimea in spite of the fact that they evicted the indigenous population in the 1940s.Skashion said:Which poster said that was ok?west didsblue said:For some people it seems to be OK if the occupiers ethnically cleansed all of the indigenous population like Stalin did with the Tatars in 1944.
On the other hand if the UN votes for the formation of a state and it's neighbours immediately try to obliterate it and lose, it's not OK for that state to exist.
Which poster said Israel shouldn't exist?
There are plenty on here who don't agree with Israel existing (not you).
Think his "on here"meant on the forum.Skashion said:Just because I think the democratic wishes of the majority have been rightly acquiesced to in 2014 the does not in any way, shape or form justify the victims of the second most deplorable man in history in the 1940s. There is no logical connection at all there. It wouldn't justify now either. If ethnic cleansing does occur I will utterly condemn it.west didsblue said:You seem to be quite happy with the Russians annexing Crimea in spite of the fact that they evicted the indigenous population in the 1940s.Skashion said:Which poster said that was ok?
Which poster said Israel shouldn't exist?
There are plenty on here who don't agree with Israel existing (not you).
Who supported Stalin's actions in the Crimea who says Israel should not exist in this thread? That is what you alluded to.
But both have to be true at once for his charge of hypocrisy to hold and I can't think of many times when Bluemoon has discussed Crimea, much less Crimean Tatars.bluemanc said:Think his "on here"meant on the forum.
Either way i'd be surprised if he was wrong with at least one of his claims,miracles do happen though.
I actually hope that the occupation of the West Bank can be resolved to everyone’s satisfaction including a viable Palestinian state and guarantees of security for the Israeli population when Israel withdraws. I was just making the point that you were being rather hypocritical with your support of the Russian position when compared to your views on Israel/Palestine just because the Russians have the advantage of having successfully ethnically cleansed Crimea previously. Perhaps the analogy with Israel/Palestine is not the best one to use.Skashion said:But both have to be true at once for his charge of hypocrisy to hold and I can't think of many times when Bluemoon has discussed Crimea, much less Crimean Tatars.bluemanc said:Think his "on here"meant on the forum.
Either way i'd be surprised if he was wrong with at least one of his claims,miracles do happen though.
If a country which has previously ethnically cleansed a people though can't be allowed to occupy said people again though, fair enough, west didsblue must immediately demand an end to Israel's occupation of the Palestinians.