The Russians are on their way...why am I not shocked.

Ducado said:
It seems that many in this thread are ignorant of Russian Expansionism which has been going on and off since about 1800, Putin is just carrying on where other have left off. Having the Ukraine as a buffer state between Russia and the rest of Europe serves us all quite well because who knows which country Vlad may fancy annexing next

Who knows where he will stop, like I have said before there are strong shades of The Sudeten crisis in what has gone on in Crimea
I agree that the annexation of the Sudetenland is the closest parallel to what has happened in the Crimea, I suspect Transnistria and Abkhazia will be next.
 
mcmanus said:
Ducado said:
It seems that many in this thread are ignorant of Russian Expansionism which has been going on and off since about 1800, Putin is just carrying on where other have left off. Having the Ukraine as a buffer state between Russia and the rest of Europe serves us all quite well because who knows which country Vlad may fancy annexing next

Who knows where he will stop, like I have said before there are strong shades of The Sudeten crisis in what has gone on in Crimea

Untwist your knickers.

Funny to think how different your reply would be if it was the US doing this at the moment
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
mcmanus said:
Ducado said:
It seems that many in this thread are ignorant of Russian Expansionism which has been going on and off since about 1800, Putin is just carrying on where other have left off. Having the Ukraine as a buffer state between Russia and the rest of Europe serves us all quite well because who knows which country Vlad may fancy annexing next

Who knows where he will stop, like I have said before there are strong shades of The Sudeten crisis in what has gone on in Crimea

Untwist your knickers.

Funny to think how different your reply would be if it was the US doing this at the moment

The US are just more subtle they do it via business interests or just blatantly bombing the shit out of a country.

I wonder how many South American countries have US sponsored govt officials acting as puppets for them?

At least the Crimeans got a vote which was more than a lot of US run proxy governments got.
 
dazdon said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
mcmanus said:
Untwist your knickers.

Funny to think how different your reply would be if it was the US doing this at the moment

The US are just more subtle they do it via business interests or just blatantly bombing the shit out of a country.

I wonder how many South American countries have US sponsored govt officials acting as puppets for them?

At least the Crimeans got a vote which was more than a lot of US run proxy governments got.

Im not searching for an argument its just funny how people think annexing a part of a country is okay if the politics is left leaning from the country doing the annexing
The Ukraine a few months ago has a sponsored puppet running the Ukraine for them, probably a few other countries near Russia with the same deal as well
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
mcmanus said:
Ducado said:
It seems that many in this thread are ignorant of Russian Expansionism which has been going on and off since about 1800, Putin is just carrying on where other have left off. Having the Ukraine as a buffer state between Russia and the rest of Europe serves us all quite well because who knows which country Vlad may fancy annexing next

Who knows where he will stop, like I have said before there are strong shades of The Sudeten crisis in what has gone on in Crimea

Untwist your knickers.

Funny to think how different your reply would be if it was the US doing this at the moment

Never had a mate blown to kingdom come because of a stupid war Russia dragged us into.
 
mcmanus said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
mcmanus said:
Untwist your knickers.

Funny to think how different your reply would be if it was the US doing this at the moment

Never had a mate blown to kingdom come because of a stupid war Russia dragged us into.

Nor have I mate but I wouldn't say its the USA's fault that our government join in
 
When you say puppet, do you mean the democratically elected pro-russian leader or the pro-western leader who took power in a coup? :)
BoyBlue_1985 said:
dazdon said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Funny to think how different your reply would be if it was the US doing this at the moment

The US are just more subtle they do it via business interests or just blatantly bombing the shit out of a country.

I wonder how many South American countries have US sponsored govt officials acting as puppets for them?

At least the Crimeans got a vote which was more than a lot of US run proxy governments got.

Im not searching for an argument its just funny how people think annexing a part of a country is okay if the politics is left leaning from the country doing the annexing
The Ukraine a few months ago has a sponsored puppet running the Ukraine for them, probably a few other countries near Russia with the same deal as well
 
aguero93:20 said:
When you say puppet, do you mean the democratically elected pro-russian leader or the pro-western leader who took power in a coup? :)
BoyBlue_1985 said:
dazdon said:
The US are just more subtle they do it via business interests or just blatantly bombing the shit out of a country.

I wonder how many South American countries have US sponsored govt officials acting as puppets for them?

At least the Crimeans got a vote which was more than a lot of US run proxy governments got.

Im not searching for an argument its just funny how people think annexing a part of a country is okay if the politics is left leaning from the country doing the annexing
The Ukraine a few months ago has a sponsored puppet running the Ukraine for them, probably a few other countries near Russia with the same deal as well

Yes democratically elected but I would suspect the same puppets he was talking about were also democratically elected. It does tend to happen in other countries as well. Egypt springs to mind. Leader was democratically elected, turns out they didn't like him and got rid
 
Yep, fairly normal fact of life, big countries constantly looking to take control of smaller countries, us still by far the worst though.
BoyBlue_1985 said:
aguero93:20 said:
When you say puppet, do you mean the democratically elected pro-russian leader or the pro-western leader who took power in a coup? :)
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Im not searching for an argument its just funny how people think annexing a part of a country is okay if the politics is left leaning from the country doing the annexing
The Ukraine a few months ago has a sponsored puppet running the Ukraine for them, probably a few other countries near Russia with the same deal as well

Yes democratically elected but I would suspect the same puppets he was talking about were also democratically elected. It does tend to happen in other countries as well. Egypt springs to mind. Leader was democratically elected, turns out they didn't like him and got rid
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.