The Stones Goal

[Beaker]

The only thing that should be being discussed is what a brilliant header it was.

 

[its a Barm]

It's bloody obvious it was a goal don't understand why there is an ongoing debate within the media.

 

[Withnail]

The game has gone, if that goal was not allowed to stand.

 

[aka blue jambo]

It's bloody obvious it was a goal don't understand why there is an ongoing debate within the media.

I think we do know why there is a fabricated debate about it.
Chelsea should be more aggrieved

 

[SWPISHOME]

Commentators were clueless

Don Goodman days hi

 

[Blue_eyes]

FS, was it a foul on the keeper as the corner came in............no,

was Bernie intefering or obstructing keepers view as Stones headed it...............also no,

There are no other ways to disallow the fcking goal.

Sky and them whipping up a hate City storm cos we won and they had prepped the studio for us dropping points lol.

They literally twisted everything to make us look bad, including the way var/ref worked and the offside issue.

Fck them and fck anyone who refuses to see it as it is.

I have already had to argue with someone over it, so well done sky for weaponising oppo fans(again).

 

[Bald fraud]

You know how bad things are when Richard’s and Sturridge.Two former city players. Are more gutted about the goal being awarded than dalgliesh’s daughter and Carragher!

 

[I'm Blue]

Is it offside?
No, he’s not interfering with play.
Is it a foul on the keeper?
No, see arsenals goal against us.
Is it controversial cos it was scored by state owned oil cheaty City?
One million percent yes.

 

[A57 the snake]

Just got in from work and watched it several times , honestly listening to the radio etc…I expected something really controversial.
I have no clue absolutely what the commotion is about.
Johnny stones a great last minute header that’s all we have.

 

[birchvillablue]

Seems like every goal we score is scrutinised and sent to VAR, love seeing the tears and bitterness from the media, stonking header from Stones.