The Sun "newspaper"

Chris in London said:
Pigeonho said:
Chippy_boy said:
If you are disagreeing with what "Chris in London" wrote (his long post), then you must be (a) a wind up merchant, (b) thick as pigshit, or (c) barking mad. In the interests of politeness - and because I think it's correct - I rule out (b) and (c).
Where have I disagreed with Chris, in London?

I think you were in Stockport once, and maybe twice in Beswick
Ha!
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
CTID1988 said:
If we were united or chelsea would they be getting that after the first leg? No fucking chance

The Sun is one of those papers which has been writing shit upon sewage ever since the Good Sheikh got his chequebook out. They are desperate at every turn for something to go wrong so they can fulfil their own wishful thinking!

A detestable, obnoxious paper that is a virus in the land! I just cannot understand how anyone would waste a penny buying the arsewipe!
Couldnt believe a week last sunday just after we beat Chelsea in the cup, Rooney on the front, middle and back pages of the Sun about his obscene wage rise to £300,000 per week, it was as if they were diverting the attention from our possible great achievement of a domestic treble. what the hell are they going to do if we actually achieve this.<br /><br />-- Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:58 pm --<br /><br />
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
CTID1988 said:
If we were united or chelsea would they be getting that after the first leg? No fucking chance

The Sun is one of those papers which has been writing shit upon sewage ever since the Good Sheikh got his chequebook out. They are desperate at every turn for something to go wrong so they can fulfil their own wishful thinking!

A detestable, obnoxious paper that is a virus in the land! I just cannot understand how anyone would waste a penny buying the arsewipe!
Couldnt believe a week last sunday just after we beat Chelsea in the cup, Rooney on the front, middle and back pages of the Sun about his obscene wage rise to £300,000 per week, it was as if they were diverting the attention from our possible great achievement of a domestic treble. what the hell are they going to do if we actually achieve this.
 
Re: The Sun "newspaper"

tijuana tev said:
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
CTID1988 said:
If we were united or chelsea would they be getting that after the first leg? No fucking chance

The Sun is one of those papers which has been writing shit upon sewage ever since the Good Sheikh got his chequebook out. They are desperate at every turn for something to go wrong so they can fulfil their own wishful thinking!

A detestable, obnoxious paper that is a virus in the land! I just cannot understand how anyone would waste a penny buying the arsewipe!
Couldnt believe a week last sunday just after we beat Chelsea in the cup, Rooney on the front, middle and back pages of the Sun about his obscene wage rise to £300,000 per week, it was as if they were diverting the attention from our possible great achievement of a domestic treble. what the hell are they going to do if we actually achieve this.

-- Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:58 pm --

Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
CTID1988 said:
If we were united or chelsea would they be getting that after the first leg? No fucking chance

The Sun is one of those papers which has been writing shit upon sewage ever since the Good Sheikh got his chequebook out. They are desperate at every turn for something to go wrong so they can fulfil their own wishful thinking!

A detestable, obnoxious paper that is a virus in the land! I just cannot understand how anyone would waste a penny buying the arsewipe!
Couldnt believe a week last sunday just after we beat Chelsea in the cup, Rooney on the front, middle and back pages of the Sun about his obscene wage rise to £300,000 per week, it was as if they were diverting the attention from our possible great achievement of a domestic treble. what the hell are they going to do if we actually achieve this.


Moyse will be sacked then Rooney will say he wants to leave. ;)
 
Pigeonho said:
Chippy_boy said:
Pigeonho said:
Did you not see the post I replied to GDM with? His is a cracking post, but then I went on to explain where I differ. It's not about disagreeing with everyone for the sake of it, it's about disagreeing with them because, believe it or not, I disagree with what they're saying in the main.

If you are disagreeing with what "Chris in London" wrote (his long post), then you must be (a) a wind up merchant, (b) thick as pigshit, or (c) barking mad. In the interests of politeness - and because I think it's correct - I rule out (b) and (c).
Where have I disagreed with Chris, in London?

Er, constantly and relentlessly.

So, in this huge about turn, to be clear, you now saying you agree with the following:

Chris said:
The point is, brand image matters. You don't get rust from one drop of rain falling on your bike, you get it from it raining all the time. Every click on a negative article about city is like another drop of rain. The effect is cumulative, and it's damaging. Every major commercial organisation in the world knows this. That's why we should worry about it.

Presumably you've sobered up then.
 
Chippy_boy said:
Pigeonho said:
Chippy_boy said:
If you are disagreeing with what "Chris in London" wrote (his long post), then you must be (a) a wind up merchant, (b) thick as pigshit, or (c) barking mad. In the interests of politeness - and because I think it's correct - I rule out (b) and (c).
Where have I disagreed with Chris, in London?

Er, constantly and relentlessly.

So, in this huge about turn, to be clear, you now saying you agree with the following:

Chris said:
The point is, brand image matters. You don't get rust from one drop of rain falling on your bike, you get it from it raining all the time. Every click on a negative article about city is like another drop of rain. The effect is cumulative, and it's damaging. Every major commercial organisation in the world knows this. That's why we should worry about it.

Presumably you've sobered up then.
I've not quoted Chris once to either agree or disagree. Infact the only post of ours either of us has quoted the othe was in humour on the previous page. So there is and never will be some 'huge about turn', so take your head for a wobble and accept these are my views on the matter, and those are Chris's. X
 
Pigeonho said:
Chippy_boy said:
Pigeonho said:
Where have I disagreed with Chris, in London?

Er, constantly and relentlessly.

So, in this huge about turn, to be clear, you now saying you agree with the following:

Chris said:
The point is, brand image matters. You don't get rust from one drop of rain falling on your bike, you get it from it raining all the time. Every click on a negative article about city is like another drop of rain. The effect is cumulative, and it's damaging. Every major commercial organisation in the world knows this. That's why we should worry about it.

Presumably you've sobered up then.
I've not quoted Chris once to either agree or disagree. Infact the only post of ours either of us has quoted the othe was in humour on the previous page. So there is and never will be some 'huge about turn', so take your head for a wobble and accept these are my views on the matter, and those are Chris's. X

So, to be clear, do you or do you not agree with the sentence below:

The point is, brand image matters. You don't get rust from one drop of rain falling on your bike, you get it from it raining all the time. Every click on a negative article about city is like another drop of rain. The effect is cumulative, and it's damaging. Every major commercial organisation in the world knows this. That's why we should worry about it.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.