riggymcfc123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 221
Mëtal Bikër said:It's the age old question isn't it. Which crest suits us the best?
Love it, it's the City i remember growing up with. But it does look dated in comparison to the professionally run club we are these days and doesn't say much about the club it represents now (unfortunately). Also, to me i'll always see it as the Crest of Manchester City at Maine Road, and she's gone.
Oh boy.....i've never liked it since we adopted it, not just for the pointless 3 stars, but the eagle, the 'tacked' on M.C.F.C in the middle which looks like someone who designed it went 'ooer...it looks good, but it doesn't mention Manchester City anywhere. Oh well, shove it between the ship and the stripes, that'll do.' It's just never been a crest that says 'we are Manchester City' to me. A gimmicky crest with all the cliche boxes ticked.
My personal Ideal choice, but never going to happen. If a design could be incorporated using elements of this crest but were also uniquely City would be the perfect badge for this club IMO.
Some good points there mate. I agree that the round badge with the lancashire rose is outdated now, still looks good on the retro gear though!
My personal favourate was the round badge from the early 70's, i'd say it covered everything, the ship (ship canal), the three stripes (3 rivers) and Manchester City F.C. around the sheild.<br /><br />-- Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:52 am --<br /><br />
HellasLEAF said:It would have been better if there were no stars so that City could one day add them as they won European Championships. Now the crest is how it is. At least it looks sharp.
That was my point really from the op, if we win the champs league in the near future would we add another star above the three, take two away or leave it as it is now?