Trickyblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2021
- Messages
- 2,021
- Team supported
- City
I said this at the time and everyone said to me it’s fine because we had Cole Palmer to replace him lol
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Manchester33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 6,860
If Liverpool win the title from here, they'll have deserved it.Let's be brutally honest, if we do lose it from here we have bottled it. We had a very, very healthy lead and have seen that lead cut with some poor, uncharacteristic performances. If we do lose it let's take it on the chin, I'm confident we'd reclaim it next season with Pep still at the helm.
We'll still win it though. Their run in is tougher than ours. They were always going to pick up points over this period.
Manchester33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 6,860
Not really.Letting Torres go mid season was a very strange decision
He wanted to go because he was unhappy in Manchester. He wasn't particularly good and we got £50m for him. It was a brilliant transfer on our part.
The strange decision was not to replace him.
Let's be brutally honest, if we do lose it from here we have bottled it. We had a very, very healthy lead and have seen that lead cut with some poor, uncharacteristic performances. If we do lose it let's take it on the chin, I'm confident we'd reclaim it next season with Pep still at the helm.
how many premier games have we lost in 4 months? Come back when you find out.
bluemoon32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 24,839
- Team supported
- City
That's what i meant in a round about way, letting him go without a replacement was weird.Not really.
He wanted to go because he was unhappy in Manchester. He wasn't particularly good and we got £50m for him. It was a brilliant transfer on our part.
The strange decision was not to replace him.
bluemoon32
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 24,839
- Team supported
- City
Don't know if I'd use the phrase 'bottled it' but whomever wins the league they will deserve it 100% and prove they're the best side in England.Let's be brutally honest, if we do lose it from here we have bottled it. We had a very, very healthy lead and have seen that lead cut with some poor, uncharacteristic performances. If we do lose it let's take it on the chin, I'm confident we'd reclaim it next season with Pep still at the helm.
I think, it'll be us
The reality is that we're the best two teams of the Premier League era and as shit as it would be there would be no shame if we end up getting pipped to the title by them.
Saying that, as long as we don't lose to them at our place I'm still confident we'll get over the line.
Saying that, as long as we don't lose to them at our place I'm still confident we'll get over the line.
I think Liverpool will beat us to the title.
We will beat them at the Etihad but i think we will drop points elsewhere.
Liverpool will carry on winning their other games.
That is my opinion
I'll wait until the Liverpool game before handing the title to them.
mancityscot
Well-Known Member
is the correct answerNot really.
He wanted to go because he was unhappy in Manchester. He wasn't particularly good and we got £50m for him. It was a brilliant transfer on our part.
The strange decision was not to replace him.
Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
And with a striker in the squad, and hopefully a couple of othersLet's be brutally honest, if we do lose it from here we have bottled it. We had a very, very healthy lead and have seen that lead cut with some poor, uncharacteristic performances. If we do lose it let's take it on the chin, I'm confident we'd reclaim it next season with Pep still at the helm.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.