deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Indeed,rather that than absolutely having to beat spurs ..Yeah. Would need to beat West ham at home to win the league.
Indeed,rather that than absolutely having to beat spurs ..Yeah. Would need to beat West ham at home to win the league.
Without a doubt.Right head on block here,would anyone take the rags getting a draw against arsenal,but we lose at spurs ?
Yeah it seems stupid in a sense,but it renders the having to beat spurs a non starter,with some getting worked up over this game myself included,but at the moment we are in the driving seat ..Without a doubt.
If we are in the driving seat having to beat West Ham by a single goal then I’ll absolutely take that.Yeah it seems stupid in a sense,but it renders the having to beat spurs a non starter,with some getting worked up over this game myself included,but at the moment we are in the driving seat ..
Yeah but it’s not scored until the 95 min ;-)If we are in the driving seat having to beat West Ham by a single goal then I’ll absolutely take that.
Much rather Untied win against Arsenal and we win against SpursRight head on block here,would anyone take the rags getting a draw against arsenal,but we lose at spurs ?
Sky would wank themselves silly if it comes down to a shootout to win the league
Now now your being greedy ..Much rather Untied win against Arsenal and we win against Spurs
Does that mean if we’re losing after 90 minutes, we’ll get a soft penalty?Everything will be done for our game to end in a draw so its a straight shootout on the last day. 100%
Does that mean if we’re losing after 90 minutes, we’ll get a soft penalty?