Ask Liv, MU, Ars, even Che how long it can last! Our all business model is based on the fact we are always competing for the title and we are always in the CL. That's how we get sponsors, adverts, world-wide support bringing in the green stuff called money. And money earned has made us one of the most financially sound football clubs around. They are not expanding Etihad for pigeons!
Ta. I would argue that owners as business savvy as ours would not predicate an entire business model on certainty of qualification to a competition that has proven, over the years, to be reasonably cyclical.
Surely, at some point, somewhere someone at a board table has said "what if we don't get that qualification boss?". And so the bean heads work out for how many years reputation degrades and for how long we can strongly compete with the exact set up in place at point of missing out. As you say on your reply, we're really financially sound, why wouldn't they mitigate for being out of Europe?
We're an old club with a great fan base but I'm not deluded, we don't have the broad base Liverpool and United do that make them a bit more resilient and able to draw large sponsors while being on the fringes, but big sponsors are also run by business folks who can see the model at City is tight, the brand is going upwards and we're a good partner.
As for players, there are countless examples of great players either going to clubs who've missed out on champs league who normally make it or great players going to clubs who don't even usually get in the top 4. Look at the steady trickle upwards of class talent from non CL teams to the top teams.
I do agree that being out of Europe (CL) is probably more negative than being in, and we do seem to have a crowd issue when it comes to Europe, but I cannot see that not qualifying this season as a "disaster". I just can't see it.