SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,507
You still have Parker down as a £3.5m income when the press report it as a free you lying twat.
SWP's back said:Nothing as they are selling Bale. They are pre spending the bale money now. Nothing more.mancitymick said:As the Spuds fans are always harping on about FFP what happens with all this outlay and they dont qualify for the CL?
And? You think they are on more than £100k per week each?mancitymick said:SWP's back said:Nothing as they are selling Bale. They are pre spending the bale money now. Nothing more.mancitymick said:As the Spuds fans are always harping on about FFP what happens with all this outlay and they dont qualify for the CL?
Point is not about fees. Bales contract is worth one of these new players if not less
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:Spurs lose Bale, they won't be as good. It's that simple.
SWP's back said:You still have Parker down as a £3.5m income when the press report it as a free you lying twat.
Lamela and Coentrao as well, I think you need another chat with your medium.GHoddle said:Millwallawayveteran1988 said:Spurs lose Bale, they won't be as good. It's that simple.
I think we'll be far more of a team without him. Yes we're probably losing Bale, but if you told me at the beginning of the summer that we'd lose Bale, but sign Willian, Lamela, Soldado, Paulinho, Capoue, Coentrao, and Chadli I'd bite your hand off. We don't need one of the best players in the world surrounded by players who aren't good enough, we need quality all over the pitch which is what we'll have now assuming that these deals pan out.
THFC6061 said:SWP's back said:You still have Parker down as a £3.5m income when the press report it as a free you lying twat.
One report, which got it wrong.
Every other one clearly states a fee was involved.
Including the BBC...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23761927
I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.
mancitymick said:THFC6061 said:SWP's back said:You still have Parker down as a £3.5m income when the press report it as a free you lying twat.
One report, which got it wrong.
Every other one clearly states a fee was involved.
Including the BBC...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23761927
I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.
The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?
nomorethaksintimes said:Serious question, if Bale falls down the stairs tomorrow are Tottenham fucked?
THFC6061 said:mancitymick said:THFC6061 said:One report, which got it wrong.
Every other one clearly states a fee was involved.
Including the BBC...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23761927
I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.
The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?
Undisclosed isn't free, is it?
QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.
THFC6061 said:I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.
undisclosed?mancitymick said:THFC6061 said:mancitymick said:The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?
Undisclosed isn't free, is it?
QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.
Never said it was free. As said it is undisclosed. Just because QPR offered a fee does not mean Fulham had to top it. He could of gone for a lot less. He aint going to play for Spuds so get him of the wage bill
stony said:THFC6061 said:I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.
Did you watch our match last night ? Did you see how well Fernandinho played and do you still think he will be "Paulinho's understudy" ?
I know who had the better debut, and I know it's only one game, but it's easy to see why we paid what we did for him and why you got Paulinho for a relatively cheap price.
squirtyflower said:undisclosed?mancitymick said:THFC6061 said:Undisclosed isn't free, is it?
QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.
Never said it was free. As said it is undisclosed. Just because QPR offered a fee does not mean Fulham had to top it. He could of gone for a lot less. He aint going to play for Spuds so get him of the wage bill
undisclosed [ˌʌndɪsˈkləʊzd]
adj
not made known or revealed ie an undisclosed sum
I'll contact Collins so they can ammend their online dicktionarymancitymick said:squirtyflower said:undisclosed?mancitymick said:Never said it was free. As said it is undisclosed. Just because QPR offered a fee does not mean Fulham had to top it. He could of gone for a lot less. He aint going to play for Spuds so get him of the wage bill
undisclosed [ˌʌndɪsˈkləʊzd]
adj
not made known or revealed ie an undisclosed sum
Unless it is Parker then undisclosed = More than QPR offered
THFC6061 said:mancitymick said:THFC6061 said:One report, which got it wrong.
Every other one clearly states a fee was involved.
Including the BBC...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23761927
I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.
The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?
Undisclosed isn't free, is it?
QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.
Here's just one report....
http://www.caughtoffside.com/2013/0...-deal-to-sign-tottenham-veteran-scott-parker/
...and another from 'The Independent'...
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...scott-parker-close-to-qpr-switch-8760280.html
squirtyflower said:I'll contact Collins so they can ammend their online dicktionarymancitymick said:squirtyflower said:undisclosed?
undisclosed [ˌʌndɪsˈkləʊzd]
adj
not made known or revealed ie an undisclosed sum
Unless it is Parker then undisclosed = More than QPR offered
Jack_mcfc_ said:THFC6061 said:mancitymick said:The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?
Undisclosed isn't free, is it?
QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.
Here's just one report....
http://www.caughtoffside.com/2013/0...-deal-to-sign-tottenham-veteran-scott-parker/
...and another from 'The Independent'...
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...scott-parker-close-to-qpr-switch-8760280.html
Ah yes, I forgot Caughtoffside is a byword for reliability