The Tottenham Thread 13/14 part 2.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You still have Parker down as a £3.5m income when the press report it as a free you lying twat.
 
mancitymick said:
SWP's back said:
mancitymick said:
As the Spuds fans are always harping on about FFP what happens with all this outlay and they dont qualify for the CL?
Nothing as they are selling Bale. They are pre spending the bale money now. Nothing more.

Point is not about fees. Bales contract is worth one of these new players if not less
And? You think they are on more than £100k per week each?

They make a profit and the TV money just went up 70%. They can afford it, with the Bale money.
 
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:
Spurs lose Bale, they won't be as good. It's that simple.

I think we'll be far more of a team without him. Yes we're probably losing Bale, but if you told me at the beginning of the summer that we'd lose Bale, but sign Willian, Lamela, Soldado, Paulinho, Capoue, Coentrao, and Chadli I'd bite your hand off. We don't need one of the best players in the world surrounded by players who aren't good enough, we need quality all over the pitch which is what we'll have now assuming that these deals pan out.
 
GHoddle said:
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:
Spurs lose Bale, they won't be as good. It's that simple.

I think we'll be far more of a team without him. Yes we're probably losing Bale, but if you told me at the beginning of the summer that we'd lose Bale, but sign Willian, Lamela, Soldado, Paulinho, Capoue, Coentrao, and Chadli I'd bite your hand off. We don't need one of the best players in the world surrounded by players who aren't good enough, we need quality all over the pitch which is what we'll have now assuming that these deals pan out.
Lamela and Coentrao as well, I think you need another chat with your medium.
 
If Tottenham really lose Bale, but get William , who is class and Lamela (who I have not seen but heard good things) along with Coentra then they have a very strong team and it's a great bit of business. Still dont have the experience to challenge for the league, but they should come fourth comfortably.
 
THFC6061 said:
SWP's back said:
You still have Parker down as a £3.5m income when the press report it as a free you lying twat.

One report, which got it wrong.

Every other one clearly states a fee was involved.

Including the BBC...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23761927

I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.

The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?
 
mancitymick said:
THFC6061 said:
SWP's back said:
You still have Parker down as a £3.5m income when the press report it as a free you lying twat.

One report, which got it wrong.

Every other one clearly states a fee was involved.

Including the BBC...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23761927

I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.

The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?

Undisclosed isn't free, is it?

QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.

Here's just one report....

http://www.caughtoffside.com/2013/0...-deal-to-sign-tottenham-veteran-scott-parker/

...and another from 'The Independent'...

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...scott-parker-close-to-qpr-switch-8760280.html
 
nomorethaksintimes said:
Serious question, if Bale falls down the stairs tomorrow are Tottenham fucked?

up shit creek without a paddle.
 
THFC6061 said:
mancitymick said:
THFC6061 said:
One report, which got it wrong.

Every other one clearly states a fee was involved.

Including the BBC...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23761927

I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.

The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?

Undisclosed isn't free, is it?

QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.

Never said it was free. As said it is undisclosed. Just because QPR offered a fee does not mean Fulham had to top it. He could of gone for a lot less. He aint going to play for Spuds so get him of the wage bill
 
THFC6061 said:
I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.

Did you watch our match last night ? Did you see how well Fernandinho played and do you still think he will be "Paulinho's understudy" ?

I know who had the better debut, and I know it's only one game, but it's easy to see why we paid what we did for him and why you got Paulinho for a relatively cheap price.
 
mancitymick said:
THFC6061 said:
mancitymick said:
The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?

Undisclosed isn't free, is it?

QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.

Never said it was free. As said it is undisclosed. Just because QPR offered a fee does not mean Fulham had to top it. He could of gone for a lot less. He aint going to play for Spuds so get him of the wage bill
undisclosed?

undisclosed [ˌʌndɪsˈkləʊzd]
adj
not made known or revealed ie an undisclosed sum
 
stony said:
THFC6061 said:
I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.

Did you watch our match last night ? Did you see how well Fernandinho played and do you still think he will be "Paulinho's understudy" ?

I know who had the better debut, and I know it's only one game, but it's easy to see why we paid what we did for him and why you got Paulinho for a relatively cheap price.

City played very well indeed against a woeful Newcastle side reduced to 10 men.

Fernandinho had an excellent debut.
 
squirtyflower said:
mancitymick said:
THFC6061 said:
Undisclosed isn't free, is it?

QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.

Never said it was free. As said it is undisclosed. Just because QPR offered a fee does not mean Fulham had to top it. He could of gone for a lot less. He aint going to play for Spuds so get him of the wage bill
undisclosed?

undisclosed [ˌʌndɪsˈkləʊzd]
adj
not made known or revealed ie an undisclosed sum

Unless it is Parker then undisclosed = More than QPR offered
 
mancitymick said:
squirtyflower said:
mancitymick said:
Never said it was free. As said it is undisclosed. Just because QPR offered a fee does not mean Fulham had to top it. He could of gone for a lot less. He aint going to play for Spuds so get him of the wage bill
undisclosed?

undisclosed [ˌʌndɪsˈkləʊzd]
adj
not made known or revealed ie an undisclosed sum

Unless it is Parker then undisclosed = More than QPR offered
I'll contact Collins so they can ammend their online dicktionary
 
THFC6061 said:
mancitymick said:
THFC6061 said:
One report, which got it wrong.

Every other one clearly states a fee was involved.

Including the BBC...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23761927

I don't expect an apology, but please refrain from calling me a "lying twat" in the future, there's a good chap.

The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?

Undisclosed isn't free, is it?

QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.

Here's just one report....

http://www.caughtoffside.com/2013/0...-deal-to-sign-tottenham-veteran-scott-parker/

...and another from 'The Independent'...

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...scott-parker-close-to-qpr-switch-8760280.html



Ah yes, I forgot Caughtoffside is a byword for reliability
 
squirtyflower said:
mancitymick said:
squirtyflower said:
undisclosed?

undisclosed [ˌʌndɪsˈkləʊzd]
adj
not made known or revealed ie an undisclosed sum

Unless it is Parker then undisclosed = More than QPR offered
I'll contact Collins so they can ammend their online dicktionary

Thanks mate. Saved me a job. He is back on line now after having his Spaghetti hoops so he may reply
 
Jack_mcfc_ said:
THFC6061 said:
mancitymick said:
The BBC states Undisclosed so where do you get you 3.5 million from?

Undisclosed isn't free, is it?

QPR were offering around that amount and Fulham topped it.

Here's just one report....

http://www.caughtoffside.com/2013/0...-deal-to-sign-tottenham-veteran-scott-parker/

...and another from 'The Independent'...

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...scott-parker-close-to-qpr-switch-8760280.html



Ah yes, I forgot Caughtoffside is a byword for reliability

Well you won't like The Sun either, I suppose...

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...ott-Parker-fought-over-by-Fulham-and-QPR.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top