Speaker said:Do agree with the arsenal and Chelsea points. Most Chelsea fans are foul racist fucktards who struggle to spell their own name. Arsenal fans (in contrast) generally come across quite well. Piers Morgan aside of course ;) and arsenal actually play good football opposed to the defence first tactics of Chelsea, which has resulted in some great derbies. Always refreshing to see arsenal play spurs as it is usually two sides who genuinely seem to want to score one goal more than the other, not bore each other to death.
I'd say that Eriksen and Paulinho were 'established' players.and not established (Other than Soldado)
They're either not previously established, or distinctly world class. Fucking Spud fanspenguins4kompany said:I'd say that Eriksen and Paulinho were 'established' players.and not established (Other than Soldado)
penguins4kompany said:I'd say that Eriksen and Paulinho were 'established' players.and not established (Other than Soldado)
Randon1 said:Speaker said:Do agree with the arsenal and Chelsea points. Most Chelsea fans are foul racist fucktards who struggle to spell their own name. Arsenal fans (in contrast) generally come across quite well. Piers Morgan aside of course ;) and arsenal actually play good football opposed to the defence first tactics of Chelsea, which has resulted in some great derbies. Always refreshing to see arsenal play spurs as it is usually two sides who genuinely seem to want to score one goal more than the other, not bore each other to death.
I've got a lot of friends and family who are chelsea, some of the crap they post on social media is horrific to be fair - racist, homophobic... don't really see that stuff from any Arsenal fans.
But then, what do you expect with someone like that, as the club captain - probably the most despised player in the prem.
The point I was making bluetg, was that Spurs seem to be making excuses, where I was arguing that Eriksen and Paulinho were arguably established players already before joining them. Likewise, Lloris and Vertonghen. No excuses.Randon1 said:We lost our main asset in Bale, and found ourselves with 100 million in our pocket, so yes, whilst we did spend 100 million, we didn't actually spend anything that we didn't make back. The players we have bought are all very young, and not established (Other than Soldado), so absolutely this investment of money is for the future years to come.
You may call us illiterate Nazi hooligans if you will, but to suggest Spurs play better football is taking the biscuit.Speaker said:Do agree with the arsenal and Chelsea points. Most Chelsea fans are foul racist fucktards who struggle to spell their own name. Arsenal fans (in contrast) generally come across quite well. Piers Morgan aside of course ;) and arsenal actually play good football opposed to the defence first tactics of Chelsea, which has resulted in some great derbies. Always refreshing to see arsenal play spurs as it is usually two sides who genuinely seem to want to score one goal more than the other, not bore each other to death.
Castiel said:You may call us illiterate Nazi hooligans if you will, but to suggest Spurs play better football is taking the biscuit.Speaker said:Do agree with the arsenal and Chelsea points. Most Chelsea fans are foul racist fucktards who struggle to spell their own name. Arsenal fans (in contrast) generally come across quite well. Piers Morgan aside of course ;) and arsenal actually play good football opposed to the defence first tactics of Chelsea, which has resulted in some great derbies. Always refreshing to see arsenal play spurs as it is usually two sides who genuinely seem to want to score one goal more than the other, not bore each other to death.
Season - Chelsea/Spurs - Total goals scored.
2013/14 - 14 / 8 (so far!)
2012/13 - 75 / 66
2011/12 - 65 / 66
2010/11 - 69 / 55
2009/10 - 103 / 67
2008/09 - 68 / 45
And I thought all spuds were boring statisticians.