Marvin said:Good for top 4 spot. Not good for top spot. Their safety first approach suggests given up on top spotDucado said:Good point for Spuds that
You can bet your life they'll bend over for the rags.
Marvin said:Good for top 4 spot. Not good for top spot. Their safety first approach suggests given up on top spotDucado said:Good point for Spuds that
Marvin said:Good for top 4 spot. Not good for top spot. Their safety first approach suggests given up on top spotDucado said:Good point for Spuds that
No one will catch them.Castiel said:To be fair to them, they shouldn't try to do too much too soon. If they had gone out to win that and it back fired, they could risk losing out on top 4 altogether. They know they're not winning the title, so during this tough run of games their plan is probably to not lose. I didn't expect it and its smart from whoever is running the show there (if it works of course).Marvin said:Good for top 4 spot. Not good for top spot. Their safety first approach suggests given up on top spotDucado said:Good point for Spuds that
Ducado said:Good point for Spuds that
spurspinter1 said:Anyone savy on the rule regarding bans/violent conduct after the game with Suarez?
He'll most likely get away with it, which is ridiculous, any gifs floating about? From what I saw it couldn't have been accidental, utter scumbag of a player in every sense of the word.
Pam said:Now someone from Spuds is saying that they never lose to the better sides. WTF? We have beaten them twice, including a 1-5 thrashing ... and the rags have demolished them this season to boot and may shortly do so again. Dear God, the delusion.