MCC
Well-Known Member
THFC6061 said:
We also have 10 points from those fixtures and 4 of those have been played away from home. We'll be on 13 by the time we beat Spurs in a few weeks. :-)
THFC6061 said:
M18CTID said:Stony's post was a bit blunt but I think he makes a good point. Spurs have done very well so far this season - better than many of us expected - and I'd say they're pretty much guaranteed 4th at least while they still have a real chance of winning the league as things stand.
However, I think there has to be a change of policy with regards to the wage structure for them to maintain their place in the top 4 and kick on in subsequent seasons. I'm not saying they have to pay the kind of wages we have had to but they do need to raise their wage ceiling to keep their better players and entice new ones to the club. Modric is a classic case in point of course.
JimB said:M18CTID said:Stony's post was a bit blunt but I think he makes a good point. Spurs have done very well so far this season - better than many of us expected - and I'd say they're pretty much guaranteed 4th at least while they still have a real chance of winning the league as things stand.
However, I think there has to be a change of policy with regards to the wage structure for them to maintain their place in the top 4 and kick on in subsequent seasons. I'm not saying they have to pay the kind of wages we have had to but they do need to raise their wage ceiling to keep their better players and entice new ones to the club. Modric is a classic case in point of course.
As I said in my earlier post, this is already happening. Priority has shifted from bringing in new players to keeping the ones that we have.
That's why Spurs have spent comparatively little on new players over the past two years while the wage bill has increased.
The dilemma for Levy is that, until the new stadium is built and / or until Spurs are a regular Champions League qualifier, he will always have to prioritise either squad improvement or squad retention. Not both. He can't spend big on wages and player transfers.
THFC6061 said:JimB said:M18CTID said:Stony's post was a bit blunt but I think he makes a good point. Spurs have done very well so far this season - better than many of us expected - and I'd say they're pretty much guaranteed 4th at least while they still have a real chance of winning the league as things stand.
However, I think there has to be a change of policy with regards to the wage structure for them to maintain their place in the top 4 and kick on in subsequent seasons. I'm not saying they have to pay the kind of wages we have had to but they do need to raise their wage ceiling to keep their better players and entice new ones to the club. Modric is a classic case in point of course.
As I said in my earlier post, this is already happening. Priority has shifted from bringing in new players to keeping the ones that we have.
That's why Spurs have spent comparatively little on new players over the past two years while the wage bill has increased.
The dilemma for Levy is that, until the new stadium is built and / or until Spurs are a regular Champions League qualifier, he will always have to prioritise either squad improvement or squad retention. Not both. He can't spend big on wages and player transfers.
Actually, Tottenham's wage bill has actually decreased, due to selling-on quite a few senior squad players (Crouch, Palacios, Hutton & Keane for example) who were surplus to current requirements and loaning-out others (Caulker, Naughton, Bentley & Jenas to name just four).
fbloke said:How lucky are we to have the owner we have
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...on-raising-funds-from-American-investors.html