The Westminster Paedophile Dossier

[Kazzydeyna]

Ted heath was a known paedo and child killer who used to sail to jersey in his,yacht and then dispose of the bodies in the channel.

Also, as Saville was so close to and friendly with senior royals (Charles and Phillip and the queen) MI5/6 MUST have known.

For him to then still be allowed within 100 miles of them tells me they were in on it.

Prince Charles, Prince Phillip and the queen are, imo serious child abusers. As are many at the top of society and government

Really?

Not sure id be prepared to put accusations like this in the public domain.

As unbelievable as it sounds they have already been put in the public domain and nobody has been sued.

And I agree with an earlier poster that it sounds daft and ridiculous that the senior royals are child abusers but think of it this way...

.. Mi5/6 (never sure which one is domestic security but one of them is) MUST by LAW have investigated every single moment of savilles life BEFORE allowing him anywhere near any member of the royal family. That's just Good security not to mention common sense. Having done so they simply have to have known about his "activities" with children and dead bodies. They then MUST have let these things be known to the royal family, not to mention successive uk governments AS A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY. That he (saville) was then allowed access to the inner circle of the royal family with their agreement tells me that they at least "didn't disapprove" of his activities and very possibly even went along with them.

I fully appreciate this sounds ridiculous but it is the only logical conclusion I can come to.

I'm not trying to win an argument here or score points, its just a logical conclusion.

The royal family were, at the very least, prepared to turn a blind eye to a serial paedophile and necrophiliac in their midst, and at worst were complicit.

And Seville was "outed" years before he died, as was ted Heath, and guess what? Neither sued.

Makes you think.

 

[Wilf Wild 1937]

I keep imaging the following conversation taking place:-

David Cameron: Well have you found that dossier yet Theresa?

Theresa May: Yes Prime Minister and its not good news.

David Cameron: Bloody hell, was Brittan covering it up?

Theresa May: Err yes he was and it gets worse he was part of the paedo ring.

David Cameron: Oh my God that's terrible. We need to expose him. My administration is clean.

Theresa May: It went higher than him.

David Cameron: WHAT???

Theresa May: Ted Heath was also one and he murdered children.

David Cameron: Jesus Christ. We're going to have to expose him as well. This could be curtains for the party.
Still I've got to do what's right. It's for the good of the country.

Theresa May: Before you do anything hasty Prime Minister did you ever read the dossier on what really happened to Diana?

David Cameron: No I didn't. What dossier? Oh shit. You mean? Best try to cover it all up. It's for the good of the country.

OF COURSE I DON'T REALLY BELIEVE SUCH A CONVERSATION ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE.

 

[The Silver Surfer]

As unbelievable as it sounds they have already been put in the public domain and nobody has been sued.

And I agree with an earlier poster that it sounds daft and ridiculous that the senior royals are child abusers but think of it this way...

.. Mi5/6 (never sure which one is domestic security but one of them is) MUST by LAW have investigated every single moment of savilles life BEFORE allowing him anywhere near any member of the royal family. That's just Good security not to mention common sense. Having done so they simply have to have known about his "activities" with children and dead bodies. They then MUST have let these things be known to the royal family, not to mention successive uk governments AS A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY. That he (saville) was then allowed access to the inner circle of the royal family with their agreement tells me that they at least "didn't disapprove" of his activities and very possibly even went along with them.

I fully appreciate this sounds ridiculous but it is the only logical conclusion I can come to.

I'm not trying to win an argument here or score points, its just a logical conclusion.

The royal family were, at the very least, prepared to turn a blind eye to a serial paedophile and necrophiliac in their midst, and at worst were complicit.

And Seville was "outed" years before he died, as was ted Heath, and guess what? Neither sued.

Makes you think.

I thought it only came out he was into the dead after y that last report came out about his involvement with hospitals he worked at, something about a nurse witnessing it?

If he was investigated as part of going see the royals, there had been no prosecutions only rumours at that point. The attitude of that time was simply turn a blind eye and to cases of abuse and I don't believe he our anyone would be left alone with anyone of the royal family.
I remember my mum saying there was a club in Manchester she'd go where the girls knew to stay clear him when turned up cos he was a perv/weirdo/nonce.

 

[Kazzydeyna]

As unbelievable as it sounds they have already been put in the public domain and nobody has been sued.

And I agree with an earlier poster that it sounds daft and ridiculous that the senior royals are child abusers but think of it this way...

.. Mi5/6 (never sure which one is domestic security but one of them is) MUST by LAW have investigated every single moment of savilles life BEFORE allowing him anywhere near any member of the royal family. That's just Good security not to mention common sense. Having done so they simply have to have known about his "activities" with children and dead bodies. They then MUST have let these things be known to the royal family, not to mention successive uk governments AS A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY. That he (saville) was then allowed access to the inner circle of the royal family with their agreement tells me that they at least "didn't disapprove" of his activities and very possibly even went along with them.

I fully appreciate this sounds ridiculous but it is the only logical conclusion I can come to.

I'm not trying to win an argument here or score points, its just a logical conclusion.

The royal family were, at the very least, prepared to turn a blind eye to a serial paedophile and necrophiliac in their midst, and at worst were complicit.

And Seville was "outed" years before he died, as was ted Heath, and guess what? Neither sued.

Makes you think.

I thought it only came out he was into the dead after y that last report came out about his involvement with hospitals he worked at, something about a nurse witnessing it?

If he was investigated as part of going see the royals, there had been no prosecutions only rumours at that point. The attitude of that time was simply turn a blind eye and to cases of abuse and I don't believe he our anyone would be left alone with anyone of the royal family.
I remember my mum saying there was a club in Manchester she'd go where the girls knew to stay clear him when turned up cos he was a perv/weirdo/nonce.

Exactly! If your mum knew he was a nonce and stayed well clear, why didn't the royals?

 

[The Silver Surfer]

Exactly! If your mum knew he was a nonce and stayed well clear, why didn't the royals?

Yeah but no one could prove it be it my mum or government security.

Thats why there were no charges or convictions only heresay, so security couldnt say, "you can't meet with him Liz he's bumming everything that moves".

It just seems more believable than the Windsors being a family of pedophiles.

 

[scotty123]

Ted heath was a known paedo and child killer who used to sail to jersey in his,yacht and then dispose of the bodies in the channel.

Also, as Saville was so close to and friendly with senior royals (Charles and Phillip and the queen) MI5/6 MUST have known.

For him to then still be allowed within 100 miles of them tells me they were in on it.

Prince Charles, Prince Phillip and the queen are, imo serious child abusers. As are many at the top of society and government

What utter horse shit, and i'm surprised the mods let that through

 

[No6]

To be fair, some senior members DO have previous when it comes to fraternising with nonces. Look up Prince Andrew's connections to his good mate Jeffrey Epstein...

 

[abu13]

Well, i'm not taking issue with anything that's being said in this thread because if half of what is quoted is true then i am a nieve old fool.

 

[dronefromsector7g]

Ted heath was a known paedo and child killer who used to sail to jersey in his,yacht and then dispose of the bodies in the channel.

Also, as Saville was so close to and friendly with senior royals (Charles and Phillip and the queen) MI5/6 MUST have known.

For him to then still be allowed within 100 miles of them tells me they were in on it.

Prince Charles, Prince Phillip and the queen are, imo serious child abusers. As are many at the top of society and government

What utter horse shit, and i'm surprised the mods let that through

I thought the Windsors were reptiles, not rapists.

 

[scotty123]

Ted heath was a known paedo and child killer who used to sail to jersey in his,yacht and then dispose of the bodies in the channel.

Also, as Saville was so close to and friendly with senior royals (Charles and Phillip and the queen) MI5/6 MUST have known.

For him to then still be allowed within 100 miles of them tells me they were in on it.

Prince Charles, Prince Phillip and the queen are, imo serious child abusers. As are many at the top of society and government

What utter horse shit, and i'm surprised the mods let that through

I thought the Windsors were reptiles, not rapists.

The Queen is a serious child abuser, i'v fucking heard it all now, the stupidity of some people and what they read on social media or wherever they get it from is miles beyond me
Hope Ric has deep pockets