The Westminster Paedophile Dossier

[bonespost]

Didn't a certain Lord like to go sailing to Jersey.

 

[Kazzydeyna]

What utter horse shit, and i'm surprised the mods let that through

I thought the Windsors were reptiles, not rapists.

The Queen is a serious child abuser, i'v fucking heard it all now, the stupidity of some people and what they read on social media or wherever they get it from is miles beyond me
Hope Ric has deep pockets

Fair enough if that's your view, you're more than entitled to it. And I readily admit, your view is infinitely more mainstream than my own.
As I said earlier, I'm not after convincing anyone, or winning any arguments on here or elsewhere but I firmly believe that the royal family are at the very very least complicit in covering up Savilles perversions. Simply because they MUST MUST MUST have known what he was up to. Half the entertainment industry was aware and the best security services in the western world WOULD, WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, have known for absolute certain.
That JS was the not only allowed within 100 miles of senior royals, but actively welcomed and accepted by said royals leads me to believe that they were at the very least complicit in it (and if so , why??) and at worst in it with him. Up to their necks.
Ditto with the senior levels of the establishment.

I won't be sued and neither will Ric or this site, simply because you can't sue someone successfully if they are telling the truth.

I'm not asking you or anyone to believe me, clearly you don't and that's fine, but I believe it and I'm confident that one day, probably long after I'm dead and gone, it will come out.

 

[scotty123]

I thought the Windsors were reptiles, not rapists.

The Queen is a serious child abuser, i'v fucking heard it all now, the stupidity of some people and what they read on social media or wherever they get it from is miles beyond me
Hope Ric has deep pockets

Fair enough if that's your view, you're more than entitled to it. And I readily admit, your view is infinitely more mainstream than my own.
As I said earlier, I'm not after convincing anyone, or winning any arguments on here or elsewhere but I firmly believe that the royal family are at the very very least complicit in covering up Savilles perversions. Simply because they MUST MUST MUST have known what he was up to. Half the entertainment industry was aware and the best security services in the western world WOULD, WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, have known for absolute certain.
That JS was the not only allowed within 100 miles of senior royals, but actively welcomed and accepted by said royals leads me to believe that they were at the very least complicit in it (and if so , why??) and at worst in it with him. Up to their necks.
Ditto with the senior levels of the establishment.

I won't be sued and neither will Ric or this site, simply because you can't sue someone successfully if they are telling the truth.

I'm not asking you or anyone to believe me, clearly you don't and that's fine, but I believe it and I'm confident that one day, probably long after I'm dead and gone, it will come out.

Good post and I admire your convictions, as you say everybody is entitled to their opinion
Seeing as though you have caught my attention on the subject of the Queen being a serial kiddie fiddler can you show me where your proof has come from that Savile was in the Queens deep inner circle
Just because he was a famous DJ back in the 60s and 70s doesn't mean he will be allowed to move in that class of society, for a start they probably knew he was 'dodgy' because if my Mam and Step Dad knew he was 'dodgy' and banned him from ever coming into our pub near Granada Studios in the earlt 70s then you can bet the Royals knew, they probably took the piss out of him anyway

 

[Kazzydeyna]

The Queen is a serious child abuser, i'v fucking heard it all now, the stupidity of some people and what they read on social media or wherever they get it from is miles beyond me
Hope Ric has deep pockets

Fair enough if that's your view, you're more than entitled to it. And I readily admit, your view is infinitely more mainstream than my own.
As I said earlier, I'm not after convincing anyone, or winning any arguments on here or elsewhere but I firmly believe that the royal family are at the very very least complicit in covering up Savilles perversions. Simply because they MUST MUST MUST have known what he was up to. Half the entertainment industry was aware and the best security services in the western world WOULD, WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, have known for absolute certain.
That JS was the not only allowed within 100 miles of senior royals, but actively welcomed and accepted by said royals leads me to believe that they were at the very least complicit in it (and if so , why??) and at worst in it with him. Up to their necks.
Ditto with the senior levels of the establishment.

I won't be sued and neither will Ric or this site, simply because you can't sue someone successfully if they are telling the truth.

I'm not asking you or anyone to believe me, clearly you don't and that's fine, but I believe it and I'm confident that one day, probably long after I'm dead and gone, it will come out.

Good post and I admire your convictions, as you say everybody is entitled to their opinion
Seeing as though you have caught my attention on the subject of the Queen being a serial kiddie fiddler can you show me where your proof has come from that Savile was in the Queens deep inner circle
Just because he was a famous DJ back in the 60s and 70s doesn't mean he will be allowed to move in that class of society, for a start they probably knew he was 'dodgy' because if my Mam and Step Dad knew he was 'dodgy' and banned him from ever coming into our pub near Granada Studios in the earlt 70s then you can bet the Royals knew, they probably took the piss out of him anyway

Cheers mate and it's nice to be able to disagree on here without it getting daft.

Just google "jimmy Savilles and the royal family" or words to that effect and you'll come across many newspaper articles (many from when he was still alive and everyone thought him a decent enough chap etc) that describe his ties to the windsors.

It's well known (since before his death) that he was close to Charlie. Hrh had close links with JS to a charity that helped wheelchair users (I forget it's name).
It was also widely reported in the late 80's and 90's that he was asked to give "support" to prince Andrew around his divorce from fergie. He was regularly seen visiting the royals at special times of the year throughout the 80's too. Not to mention the ny eve he spent with Mrs thatcher (I'm not saying she was dodgy in that way, but it's becoming more clear that senior members of her govt were - hence the title of this thread).

My point is that the security service must have known what he was and to then allow him to even meet the royals not once but many times and for Charlie to send him a greetings card saying "no one will ever know what you have done for this country" seems decidedly dodgy.

To ruin a phrase, if it sounds like a paedo, if it smells like a paedo, it's a paedo.

I know my view is very much a monority one on here and elsewhere (I've tried talking about it to people at work and got some very funny looks!) but I honestly do believe it.

 

[Chancy Termites]

Whoever puts this site together must have a whole load more time on their hands than I do, but it's thousands of scanned newspaper articles going back over the last 30+ years.

http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com

Added together, it's absolutely amazing just how many reports there have been over the years.

 

[scotty123]

Fair enough if that's your view, you're more than entitled to it. And I readily admit, your view is infinitely more mainstream than my own.
As I said earlier, I'm not after convincing anyone, or winning any arguments on here or elsewhere but I firmly believe that the royal family are at the very very least complicit in covering up Savilles perversions. Simply because they MUST MUST MUST have known what he was up to. Half the entertainment industry was aware and the best security services in the western world WOULD, WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, have known for absolute certain.
That JS was the not only allowed within 100 miles of senior royals, but actively welcomed and accepted by said royals leads me to believe that they were at the very least complicit in it (and if so , why??) and at worst in it with him. Up to their necks.
Ditto with the senior levels of the establishment.

I won't be sued and neither will Ric or this site, simply because you can't sue someone successfully if they are telling the truth.

I'm not asking you or anyone to believe me, clearly you don't and that's fine, but I believe it and I'm confident that one day, probably long after I'm dead and gone, it will come out.

Good post and I admire your convictions, as you say everybody is entitled to their opinion
Seeing as though you have caught my attention on the subject of the Queen being a serial kiddie fiddler can you show me where your proof has come from that Savile was in the Queens deep inner circle
Just because he was a famous DJ back in the 60s and 70s doesn't mean he will be allowed to move in that class of society, for a start they probably knew he was 'dodgy' because if my Mam and Step Dad knew he was 'dodgy' and banned him from ever coming into our pub near Granada Studios in the earlt 70s then you can bet the Royals knew, they probably took the piss out of him anyway

Cheers mate and it's nice to be able to disagree on here without it getting daft.

Just google "jimmy Savilles and the royal family" or words to that effect and you'll come across many newspaper articles (many from when he was still alive and everyone thought him a decent enough chap etc) that describe his ties to the windsors.

It's well known (since before his death) that he was close to Charlie. Hrh had close links with JS to a charity that helped wheelchair users (I forget it's name).
It was also widely reported in the late 80's and 90's that he was asked to give "support" to prince Andrew around his divorce from fergie. He was regularly seen visiting the royals at special times of the year throughout the 80's too. Not to mention the ny eve he spent with Mrs thatcher (I'm not saying she was dodgy in that way, but it's becoming more clear that senior members of her govt were - hence the title of this thread).

My point is that the security service must have known what he was and to then allow him to even meet the royals not once but many times and for Charlie to send him a greetings card saying "no one will ever know what you have done for this country" seems decidedly dodgy.

To ruin a phrase, if it sounds like a paedo, if it smells like a paedo, it's a paedo.

I know my view is very much a monority one on here and elsewhere (I've tried talking about it to people at work and got some very funny looks!) but I honestly do believe it.

I'v had a browse through some of those sites and they all seem to believe in one person 'David Icke' so with that i'm out
Keep digging though and keep us posted

 

[Chancy Termites]

Good post and I admire your convictions, as you say everybody is entitled to their opinion
Seeing as though you have caught my attention on the subject of the Queen being a serial kiddie fiddler can you show me where your proof has come from that Savile was in the Queens deep inner circle
Just because he was a famous DJ back in the 60s and 70s doesn't mean he will be allowed to move in that class of society, for a start they probably knew he was 'dodgy' because if my Mam and Step Dad knew he was 'dodgy' and banned him from ever coming into our pub near Granada Studios in the earlt 70s then you can bet the Royals knew, they probably took the piss out of him anyway

Cheers mate and it's nice to be able to disagree on here without it getting daft.

Just google "jimmy Savilles and the royal family" or words to that effect and you'll come across many newspaper articles (many from when he was still alive and everyone thought him a decent enough chap etc) that describe his ties to the windsors.

It's well known (since before his death) that he was close to Charlie. Hrh had close links with JS to a charity that helped wheelchair users (I forget it's name).
It was also widely reported in the late 80's and 90's that he was asked to give "support" to prince Andrew around his divorce from fergie. He was regularly seen visiting the royals at special times of the year throughout the 80's too. Not to mention the ny eve he spent with Mrs thatcher (I'm not saying she was dodgy in that way, but it's becoming more clear that senior members of her govt were - hence the title of this thread).

My point is that the security service must have known what he was and to then allow him to even meet the royals not once but many times and for Charlie to send him a greetings card saying "no one will ever know what you have done for this country" seems decidedly dodgy.

To ruin a phrase, if it sounds like a paedo, if it smells like a paedo, it's a paedo.

I know my view is very much a monority one on here and elsewhere (I've tried talking about it to people at work and got some very funny looks!) but I honestly do believe it.

I'v had a browse through some of those sites and they all seem to believe in one person 'David Icke' so with that i'm out
Keep digging though and keep us posted

Take a look at the link I posted above. All mainstream stuff. Plenty more recently even in the Telegraph yesterday. Also look at Exaro News who are a respected organisation who've been at the forefront of the recent reports. Not necessarily the royal family but the idea that there might be an establishment Paedophile ring at all was a far-out Icke conspiracy theory until not long ago.

 

[scotty123]

Cheers mate and it's nice to be able to disagree on here without it getting daft.

Just google "jimmy Savilles and the royal family" or words to that effect and you'll come across many newspaper articles (many from when he was still alive and everyone thought him a decent enough chap etc) that describe his ties to the windsors.

It's well known (since before his death) that he was close to Charlie. Hrh had close links with JS to a charity that helped wheelchair users (I forget it's name).
It was also widely reported in the late 80's and 90's that he was asked to give "support" to prince Andrew around his divorce from fergie. He was regularly seen visiting the royals at special times of the year throughout the 80's too. Not to mention the ny eve he spent with Mrs thatcher (I'm not saying she was dodgy in that way, but it's becoming more clear that senior members of her govt were - hence the title of this thread).

My point is that the security service must have known what he was and to then allow him to even meet the royals not once but many times and for Charlie to send him a greetings card saying "no one will ever know what you have done for this country" seems decidedly dodgy.

To ruin a phrase, if it sounds like a paedo, if it smells like a paedo, it's a paedo.

I know my view is very much a monority one on here and elsewhere (I've tried talking about it to people at work and got some very funny looks!) but I honestly do believe it.

I'v had a browse through some of those sites and they all seem to believe in one person 'David Icke' so with that i'm out
Keep digging though and keep us posted

Take a look at the link I posted above. All mainstream stuff. Plenty more recently even in the Telegraph yesterday. Also look at Exaro News who are a respected organisation who've been at the forefront of the recent reports. Not necessarily the royal family but the idea that there might be an establishment Paedophile ring at all was a far-out Icke conspiracy theory until not long ago.

Mind boggling

 

[Kazzydeyna]

Good post and I admire your convictions, as you say everybody is entitled to their opinion
Seeing as though you have caught my attention on the subject of the Queen being a serial kiddie fiddler can you show me where your proof has come from that Savile was in the Queens deep inner circle
Just because he was a famous DJ back in the 60s and 70s doesn't mean he will be allowed to move in that class of society, for a start they probably knew he was 'dodgy' because if my Mam and Step Dad knew he was 'dodgy' and banned him from ever coming into our pub near Granada Studios in the earlt 70s then you can bet the Royals knew, they probably took the piss out of him anyway

Cheers mate and it's nice to be able to disagree on here without it getting daft.

Just google "jimmy Savilles and the royal family" or words to that effect and you'll come across many newspaper articles (many from when he was still alive and everyone thought him a decent enough chap etc) that describe his ties to the windsors.

It's well known (since before his death) that he was close to Charlie. Hrh had close links with JS to a charity that helped wheelchair users (I forget it's name).
It was also widely reported in the late 80's and 90's that he was asked to give "support" to prince Andrew around his divorce from fergie. He was regularly seen visiting the royals at special times of the year throughout the 80's too. Not to mention the ny eve he spent with Mrs thatcher (I'm not saying she was dodgy in that way, but it's becoming more clear that senior members of her govt were - hence the title of this thread).

My point is that the security service must have known what he was and to then allow him to even meet the royals not once but many times and for Charlie to send him a greetings card saying "no one will ever know what you have done for this country" seems decidedly dodgy.

To ruin a phrase, if it sounds like a paedo, if it smells like a paedo, it's a paedo.

I know my view is very much a monority one on here and elsewhere (I've tried talking about it to people at work and got some very funny looks!) but I honestly do believe it.

I'v had a browse through some of those sites and they all seem to believe in one person 'David Icke' so with that i'm out
Keep digging though and keep us posted

David Icke has and does Come out with some pretty far out stuff (quite a bit of which I find interesting which may not surprise you!). Some of his stuff is decidedly whacky to be fair but, and its a big but, he called out Saville as a paedophile many years before his death and was derided as a loony and a fruitcake for saying such things against "good old uncle jimmy" at that time.
Turns out he (Icke) was correct all along.

That doesn't prove me right or you wrong of course but just because Icke says stuff doesn't automatically mean what he is saying is bollocks.

There's lots of links to articles in the mainstream press too, from the guardian to the star and everything inbetween!

 

[scotty123]

Cheers mate and it's nice to be able to disagree on here without it getting daft.

Just google "jimmy Savilles and the royal family" or words to that effect and you'll come across many newspaper articles (many from when he was still alive and everyone thought him a decent enough chap etc) that describe his ties to the windsors.

It's well known (since before his death) that he was close to Charlie. Hrh had close links with JS to a charity that helped wheelchair users (I forget it's name).
It was also widely reported in the late 80's and 90's that he was asked to give "support" to prince Andrew around his divorce from fergie. He was regularly seen visiting the royals at special times of the year throughout the 80's too. Not to mention the ny eve he spent with Mrs thatcher (I'm not saying she was dodgy in that way, but it's becoming more clear that senior members of her govt were - hence the title of this thread).

My point is that the security service must have known what he was and to then allow him to even meet the royals not once but many times and for Charlie to send him a greetings card saying "no one will ever know what you have done for this country" seems decidedly dodgy.

To ruin a phrase, if it sounds like a paedo, if it smells like a paedo, it's a paedo.

I know my view is very much a monority one on here and elsewhere (I've tried talking about it to people at work and got some very funny looks!) but I honestly do believe it.

I'v had a browse through some of those sites and they all seem to believe in one person 'David Icke' so with that i'm out
Keep digging though and keep us posted

David Icke has and does Come out with some pretty far out stuff (quite a bit of which I find interesting which may not surprise you!). Some of his stuff is decidedly whacky to be fair but, and its a big but, he called out Saville as a paedophile many years before his death and was derided as a loony and a fruitcake for saying such things against "good old uncle jimmy" at that time.
Turns out he (Icke) was correct all along.

That doesn't prove me right or you wrong of course but just because Icke says stuff doesn't automatically mean what he is saying is bollocks.

There's lots of links to articles in the mainstream press too, from the guardian to the star and everything inbetween!

You have got me interested in Icke now which 3 hours ago I would not have thought possible, I will read more of what he has to say and pick the bones out