Theo Walcott? ..

Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

With Walcott enterring the final year of his contract, there's a rumoured "knock down" price tag of 15mil. Chelsea / bin dippers interested. My question is... is he any better than Adam Johnson? Seriously? I think not! But would you have him in place of AJ?
 
Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Walcott would be awful for our style of play so I wouldn't swap him for Johnson, for most teams in the premier league though I think Walcott would be more effective.
 
Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Both are impact players who are most effective coming off the bench late on when the oposition are knackered. But neither of them are that great imo. I'd say all in all they are pretty much level in every area.
 
Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

I would actually say Walcott, I think Mancini would get the best out of him, look at other players in the City squad that hve improved under his mentorship, I also think Walcott has more scope for improvement than AJ.
 
Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

Would prefer the ox...that kid has a lot of potential
 
Re: Irrelevant Q, but anyway... Theo Walcott or Adam Johnson?

cyprustavern said:
Would prefer the ox...that kid has a lot of potential
Click to expand...

Good point would like to see him at City.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.