gregster101
Active Member
- Joined
- 6 Jul 2006
- Messages
- 28
BobKowalski said:Cambridgeblue said:Marvin said:It's not the web-site, it's the combination of spineless fans, and Rags who come out to gloat every time City get beat.
Doesn't matter if you have £100 Million or £1 Million, you need time to build a team. The more changes you have, the longer the transition.
Are we going to continue with this farcical match by match assessment of the City manager?
But judging managers on a match by match basis and changing them every season is what has made this club such a dominant force in the premier league and won us so many trophies over the last thirty odd years - oh wait...
Except that we don't change our manager every season. Furthermore the new owners have yet to appoint a manager and given they have stumped up £100m plus it is not unreasonable for them to assess the situation in the summer and the various managerial options open to them and choose who they think is best able to move the team and the club forward.
16 managers in 20 years? You're right we are the epitome of continuity