This Weekend's Other Games (FA Cup 3rd Rd)

Re: Arsenal Thread 2013/14

squirtyflower said:
Gillespie said:
stony said:
It's a banner at your ground, so you would presume it's there with the permission of the club.


Spot on Joe and it saves me from replying.

If that's the case, why do you assume it's aimed at you?

I'd say Chelsea is more likely. There really isn't any great animosity for City from Arsenal fans, so I do find much of the stuff in this thread a bit difficult to understand. Arsenal fans would much prefer you guys to win the title than Chelsea or Man Yoo.
Presumably you weren't one of those waving ££££ at City fans last January then?

Again not something I'm aware of, but when you are at the top (or most likely to finish as such, as you are) you are likley going to get some stick. It goes with the territory. Accept it as a badge that you are top dogs. Personally, I don't have a problem with your funding. If its in the rules, it's in the rules. No point in moaning about something you can't change or something you can't have. An exercise in futility.

I mean I wish I was Javier Bardem and could bone Penelope Cruz every night. But that's life. Some people have all the luck. Seriously, though, football goes in cycles and I'd be happy to see more seasons like this one whe it's so competitive. If I thought Man Yoo were going to win the title each year for the next 20 years, I think my appetite for the game would diminish. It needs to be competitive and we need different teams winning every now and again to maintain interest.
 
Re: Arsenal Thread 2013/14

Gillespie said:
afc16 said:
Gillespie said:
It's not a question of yes or no. It's stating the bleeding obvious which is that making wholesale generalisations about Arsenal fans or any other group of fans for that matter is wrong. You might be able to refer to a specific incidence of hypocrisy as you call it of an individual or individuals but to attribute it to a whole class of fans is nonsense. You argue from a self proclaimed position of moral superiority not warranted and based upon a logical fallacy I.e. the actions of a few can be ascribed to the many.

If you cannot understand that, that's your problem, not mine.

i wouldnt bother mate, this stony guy is going to respond with 1 of 2 things containing either

- that arsenal fans are hypocrites
- or about buying class banner

he's banged on about 1 of them 2 things in almost every post.

The jibe that 'you can't buy class' is not something I have ever said, referred to or even been aware off.

If he resents that jibe, it's not mine mate, criticise elsewhere.

apologise if you thought it was you but i was talking about stony<br /><br />-- Sun Jan 05, 2014 1:16 am --<br /><br />
JoeMercer'sWay said:
afc16 said:
stony said:
You seem to be getting a bit tetchy. Another typical gooner trait when things aren't going their way(that was a joke btw before you get your knickers well and truly in a twist)
I've never claimed City fans have any kind of moral superiority, all clubs have fans which do them no credit. I was however giving my honest opinion on a particular trait I've found in Arsenal fans. Every club has hypocritical fans, but Arsenal have a disproportionate number imo.
If you don't like the opinion of a city fan on a city forum, then I would suggest it's very much your problem and not mine.

not at all because first of all this is the general part of the forum for all football fans not just city fans. city fans don't physically own this forum, and unless the mods want to ban us we have just as much right to register and talk/discuss/argue football related matters. if however the people that DO own this forum, don't want other fans on here and don't want people disagreeing with city fans arguments and views, then yes go ahead and ban us all.

its highly unlikely you've met enough arsenal fans or football fans in general of different clubs to be able to ascertain that arsenal fans are the disproportionately bad.

it is our forum, it's owned by a City supporter, modded by City supporters and used predominantly by City supporters.

We offer you our grace to come on and discuss things with us, but you know the line and if you don't like it you can lump it.

This isn't an independent forum, so stop swannying about with this sense of entitlement like you own the place or have the right to be here, you don't, you're here at the discretion of City supporters, so whilst you're entitled to your opinion know who you're talking to and know your place.


who are you mate, scarface?
 
Re: Arsenal Thread 2013/14

stony said:
Gillespie said:
afc16 said:
i wouldnt bother mate, this stony guy is going to respond with 1 of 2 things containing either

- that arsenal fans are hypocrites
- or about buying class banner

he's banged on about 1 of them 2 things in almost every post.

The jibe that 'you can't buy class' is not something I have ever said, referred to or even been aware off.

If he resents that jibe, it's not mine mate, criticise elsewhere.

It's a banner at your ground, so you would presume it's there with the permission of the club.
JoeMercer'sWay said:
it is our forum, it's owned by a City supporter, modded by City supporters and used predominantly by City supporters.

We offer you our grace to come on and discuss things with us, but you know the line and if you don't like it you can lump it.

This isn't an independent forum, so stop swannying about with this sense of entitlement like you own the place or have the right to be here, you don't, you're here at the discretion of City supporters, so whilst you're entitled to your opinion know who you're talking to and know your place.

Spot on Joe and it saves me from replying.

you think the club vets every single banner thats brought in by 60k fans every week?

unless its offensive/racist whatever, the club has no reason to remove banners.
 
Re: Arsenal Thread 2013/14

afc16 said:
stony said:
Gillespie said:
The jibe that 'you can't buy class' is not something I have ever said, referred to or even been aware off.

If he resents that jibe, it's not mine mate, criticise elsewhere.

It's a banner at your ground, so you would presume it's there with the permission of the club.
JoeMercer'sWay said:
it is our forum, it's owned by a City supporter, modded by City supporters and used predominantly by City supporters.

We offer you our grace to come on and discuss things with us, but you know the line and if you don't like it you can lump it.

This isn't an independent forum, so stop swannying about with this sense of entitlement like you own the place or have the right to be here, you don't, you're here at the discretion of City supporters, so whilst you're entitled to your opinion know who you're talking to and know your place.

Spot on Joe and it saves me from replying.

you think the club vets every single banner thats brought in by 60k fans every week?

unless its offensive/racist whatever, the club has no reason to remove banners.
I agree wholeheartedly with you

Why on earth would either you or your club want it removed


























It suits you all to a tee
 
Wenger says Walcott should not face any further action as he was smiling and not looking aggresively to the Spurs fans.
YCNMIU
 
DTKOAG said:
Wenger says Walcott should not face any further action as he was smiling and not looking aggresively to the Spurs fans.
YCNMIU

Don't rush to judgement until all the facts are in
 
IH8MUFC said:
Blue Hefner said:
squirtyflower said:
What Walcott did was much worse than Adebyor because it wasn't the heat of the moment type thing
Scoring a goal is quite an adrenalin rush and can then incite you to become less than sensible
Being carried off on a stretcher would have give Walcott the time to weigh up his actions and he certainly made a poor choice, his was the worst abrogation of thought

If Spurs fans(who booed him when injured) can't take a bit back then there is something wrong with them. What he did isn't worse than what Adebayor did, they were both players giving it back to fans who had been giving them stick.

Not a lot in either really
Yep exactly this. If you can't take it don't dish it out.

-- Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:03 am --

squirtyflower said:
Gillespie said:
If that's the case, why do you assume it's aimed at you?

I'd say Chelsea is more likely. There really isn't any great animosity for City from Arsenal fans, so I do find much of the stuff in this thread a bit difficult to understand. Arsenal fans would much prefer you guys to win the title than Chelsea or Man Yoo.
Presumably you weren't one of those waving ££££ at City fans last January then?
Arsenal fans really crack me up. They would Know all about money given the fact that arsenal are basically robbing them with their ticket prices.

bit of a myth this thats perpetuated by mass media coverage which makes people like yourself come to the above conclusions.

a lot of clubs (norwich of the top of my head) charge away fans similar to what we charge.

yet our prices gets splashed all over the papers and made to look like we are the only ones.

the cheapest spurs season ticket is £730, ours is around £900. chelsea is over £700, liverpool is over £700.

out of the top clubs, apart from city and utd, the season ticket prices are not exactly miles apart.

the difference is we have a state of the art stadium which is worth almost £500m.

can any other club say that?

and this is the reason why most arsenal fans understand (even though they may not like it) that we pay a bit more in ticket prices.

also, there are only a handful of teams, maybe only 1 (city) that play as good if not better football then us. thats entertainment, and again its something that arsenal fans understand. id rather pay £90 to watch arsenal then £50 to watch qpr or wigan or sunderland.

-- Sun Jan 05, 2014 1:30 am --

DTKOAG said:
afc16 said:
DTKOAG said:
So Spurs are not your main rivals then ?
A policewoman knocked out cold.
I would say worst scenes at your ground tonight.

i wasn't talking about teams. i said that ade is a ex arsenal player so scoring against us and then taunting us like that is going to incite idiots more.

for example i'm going to be more wound up by rvp scoring against us then rubbing it in our face then i would if rooney did exactly the same thing.

theo is not a ex spurs player so such a minor gesture shouldn't have wound up the spurs fans anywhere near as much.

also theo was not even 10% as animated and wild as ade was, pointing out the score is no different to the old fingers to the mouth shhh celebration, its basically a very mild form of taunting. if you saw theo today he couldn't have looked more laid back and relaxed if he tried, it was obvious that it was meant as just a bit of banter, nothing more.

either way the bottom line is its ridiculous, football fans are pathetic if they can't take that, and i include arsenal fans as well.

im expecting stony to reply to this saying arsenal are being hypocrites so thought i'd mention that as well.
You keep mentioning that Adebayor is an ex Arsenal player but dont mention that what Walcott did was in your biggest game of the season against your biggest & hatred rivals.
So tell me what is the difference ?

wasn't our biggest game of the season for a start.
 
Re: Arsenal Thread 2013/14

squirtyflower said:
afc16 said:
stony said:
It's a banner at your ground, so you would presume it's there with the permission of the club.


Spot on Joe and it saves me from replying.

you think the club vets every single banner thats brought in by 60k fans every week?

unless its offensive/racist whatever, the club has no reason to remove banners.
I agree wholeheartedly with you

Why on earth would either you or your club want it removed























It suits you all to a tee


Score update

Squirty 1- Arrogant, irritatating,hypocritical, nasal, vowel-mangling cockerney 0
 
Re: Arsenal Thread 2013/14

squirtyflower said:
afc16 said:
stony said:
It's a banner at your ground, so you would presume it's there with the permission of the club.


Spot on Joe and it saves me from replying.

you think the club vets every single banner thats brought in by 60k fans every week?

unless its offensive/racist whatever, the club has no reason to remove banners.
I agree wholeheartedly with you

Why on earth would either you or your club want it removed


























It suits you all to a tee

no i seriously doubt the clubs got time to vet thousands of banners in case it offends certain clubs who have a inferiority complex and think everythings aimed at them..
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.